Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Health Care Features
Eric Cooper
Unspoken expectations are the hardest to meet
Sharona Hoffman
Vertical merger would eliminate a middleman—CVS’ pharmacy benefits manager
Scott Gottlieb
A year of advancing innovations, empowering consumers, and streamlining regulations
Jenna Gallegos
DNA samples are available via a global computer network that can be hacked
Quality Transformation With David Schwinn
System-caused problems can affect returns to hospital, increase potential for more pain

More Features

Health Care News
The FDA’s RMAT designation goes live
New company will focus on technologies for the management and automation of vital clinical processes
Marking and cutting lasers used in manufacturing endoscopic devices and catheters
Technique provides about a sixfold improvement over regular microscopes
Awards help states implement multiyear produce-safety systems
How a hospital restored quality patient care and obtained financial stability using lean
A strategic guide to implementing lean for hospital leaders

More News

Katherine Watts

Health Care

Will MACRA Fall Victim to Repeal and Replace?

Wait and see is not a productive business strategy

Published: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 - 12:01

While at the National MACRA MIPS/APM Summit in Washington, D.C., I heard much discussion centered on how to create and implement strategies that pay physicians fairly, while controlling spending in the Medicare program. It’s a question we’ve wrestled with for almost 20 years and a challenge we must solve.

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 replaces the Sustainable Growth Rate, which was almost universally hated because of annual threats of cuts in physician payments. The merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS), the default portion of MACRA, seeks to retain the basic fee-for-service payment structure and stabilize physician payments, while at the same time requiring adjustments to the size of the payments based on a physician’s ability to improve performance and control costs. The alternative payment model (APM) track is designed for providers who are already operating value-based models. Ultimately, MACRA is designed to create a healthy business model for physicians while also creating healthy populations.

As I listened to the summit’s highly respected speakers, they confirmed my belief that our healthcare system has been broken. We simply cannot return to the pre-ACA (Affordable Care Act) world of rapidly increasing costs and declining health outcomes. We must move forward, and I believe that MACRA is a step in the right direction—even with its difficulties.

Will MACRA, MIPS and APMs survive?

Under the Obama administration, it was easy to predict the future of MACRA. Its future in a Trump administration is less certain, but I think we have a couple of clues to its ultimate survival:
• MACRA and its component parts, MIPS and APMs, were passed with significant bipartisan support. Because of that support, it seems likely that MACRA will survive this Congress.
• Two criticisms of MACRA are the upcoming deadline for implementation and the lag time between reporting deadlines and the use of the data. Because of issues such as these and the time a new administration may need for review, we are likely to see tweaks to MACRA or slowdowns for implementation, but implementation will occur.
• Regardless of political or ideological arguments against MACRA, Mike Leavitt, former governor of Utah and Health and Human Services Secretary during the George W. Bush administration, said we must respond to the economic imperative to change. An unhealthy population with soaring medical costs is detrimental to the country's ability to compete.
• Remember why we’re doing this: The old system wasn’t working and devising a way to reimburse physicians fairly, control costs, and improve the quality of care benefits all stakeholders.

What action should you take now?

Throughout the summit, I heard the same advice to physicians and other providers: Don’t stop or slow your MACRA implementation, and continue your work to meet upcoming deadlines.

We don’t know how the details may change during the coming months, but you do not want to miss the opportunity for higher reimbursements because you didn’t meet existing deadlines. For example, if you report to some measure or activity during 2017, you won’t be hit with the 4-percent penalty. Waiting to see what happens is not a productive business strategy.

What will the future hold?

Andy Slavitt, acting administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said during the summit, “Health is not partisan.” I agree with him.

I also recognize that it’s possible for different paths to lead to the same destination. We must, however, keep our goal in mind or risk getting lost. An old adage warns, “If you don’t know where you’re going, any path will take you there.”

I think the Triple Aim is still an effective guidepost for us: It’s beneficial to stop and remember that our ultimate goal is better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower costs for healthcare overall.


About The Author

Katherine Watts’s picture

Katherine Watts

Katherine Watts is the partner in charge of healthcare services for HORNE LLP. She leads a team of certified public accountants and healthcare consultants providing services to physicians, medical groups, hospital systems, ambulatory surgery centers, and other healthcare organizations as they develop strategies to meet today’s market demands. Watts provides healthcare, consulting, and taxation services.