Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
FDA Compliance Features
Del Williams
Options to address the risk of combustible dust explosions for NFPA 61 compliance
Doug Folsom
Unpatched vulnerabilities will become increasingly susceptible to cyberattacks
Del Williams
Mitigate risk, prevent safety issues by utilizing closed conveyor systems designed with sanitation in mind
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
Companies say they plan to pull some or all of their devices
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
First step, migrate your QMS to a cloud-based electronic quality management system

More Features

FDA Compliance News
Company’s first funding round will be used to accelerate product development for its QMS and MES SaaS offerings
Showcasing tech, solutions, and services at Gulfood Manufacturing 2022
Easy, reliable leak testing with methylene blue
Now is not the time to skip critical factory audits and supply chain assessments
Google Docs collaboration, more efficient management of quality deviations
Delivers time, cost, and efficiency savings while streamlining compliance activity
First trial module of learning tool focuses on ISO 9001 and is available now
Free education source for global medical device community
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth

More News

Michael Causey

FDA Compliance

Much Ado About SOTU

Analysis: No need for State of the Union analysis

Published: Monday, February 3, 2014 - 11:47

Those of us in and around Washington D.C. like to tell folks in the days leading up to a president’s State of the Union (SOTU) address that the speeches rarely matter and are generally forgotten while the teleprompter’s still warm.

Then we analyze them to death for a few days. I don’t mean to sound cynical, but it does tend to help cable TV ratings and maybe even sell a few of those funny flat things called newspapers.

First, a little perspective might be in order. The good folks at the History Channel remind us that most SOTUs are remembered for reasons less to do with policy and more to do with current events. They point out that Harry Truman’s SOTU was kind of a big deal because... it was the first ever televised. Bill Clinton’s second SOTU was also a big deal... because everyone wanted to hear if he’d resign because of Monica Lewinsky and her blue dress.

Presidents Reagan and Bush II delivered memorable SOTUs, among others, but in both cases they came after significant events—the Reagan assassination attempt, and 9/11, respectively, and they will probably be remembered more for emotional rather than policy reasons.

Still, if CNN, MSNBC, Fox, and everyone else can breathlessly analyze SOTUs seconds after they’re delivered, why not do it here from a medical device perspective?

It might be interesting to start with something President Obama didn’t talk about in his 2014 address: the Medical Device Excise Tax. It’s still out there, and its prospects of becoming the law of the land have ebbed and flowed during the past year, but the president chose not to bring that one up.

To be sure, the president did devote a lot of his SOTU to domestic issues, including healthcare. However, that focus was mostly on the Affordable Health Care Act. That one’s not going away anytime soon, and we’re not going anywhere near that here.

Now back to the SOTU and the medical device community.

Smart communications professionals who work for trade associations and private companies listen closely to the SOTU for anything they can connect their industry to in order to get media coverage. This time, when President Obama spoke about the general need for innovation in this country, some saw the opportunity.

“The president is absolutely correct that investments in innovation will help the United States remain the global economic leader in the 21st century,” Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) president and CEO Mark Leahey said after the SOTU. “While there will be numerous debates on how we can improve our economy, there is widespread agreement that high-tech job creation and reducing the cost of healthcare play a central role. Medical technology innovators have a proud tradition of meeting these important goals, but we cannot take for granted that this will always be the case.”

Meanwhile, the folks at the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed) took a similar approach—but added a whack against the Medical Device Excise Tax in its response to the SOTU.

AdvaMed’s president, Stephen J. Ubl, commended the other president: “AdvaMed applauds the president’s support for the growth of high-technology manufacturing jobs and the importance of innovation to economic growth in [Obama’s] State of the Union.

“In support of that goal, we urge Congress to act promptly to repeal the Medical Device Excise Tax. America’s medical technology companies are leading the world in the development of innovative, life-saving, life-enhancing medical progress, but that lead is eroding. Repealing the Medical Device Excise Tax would support the bipartisan goal of helping companies large and small reinvest in R&D, hiring, or expanding.”

President Obama didn’t mention medical devices specifically anywhere in the speech, but what the heck. SOTUs rarely mean as much as we in the media like to tell you, remember?

 

First published Jan. 30, 2014, on the AssurX blog.

Discuss

About The Author

Michael Causey’s picture

Michael Causey

James Michael Causey’s been a journalist since he started his own neighborhood newspaper in the 1970s. In addition to quizzing FDA officials for the past 10+ years, he’s also interviewed political satirist Art Buchwald, FCC Chairman Reed Hundt, SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro, and is the past president of the Washington Independent Writers. Causey is the editor and publisher of eDataIntegrityReport.com and is a contributing writer on the AssurXblog.