{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

It’s Time for the FDA and States to Step Forward for Public Health

It shouldn’t take nearly two years to conduct a compound pharmacy inspection

Patrick Stone
Tue, 12/11/2012 - 10:52
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

It’s clear that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should have more compounding pharmacy oversight, but how long will it take them to make other important decisions on public health?

ADVERTISEMENT

The recent news is troubling.

For example, a shipment of tainted steroid from a Massachusetts-based compounding pharmacy was linked to the recent U.S. meningitis outbreak. According to state and federal records, it took the FDA approximately 684 days to issue a warning letter that may have saved lives and time. Usually it should only take 90 days for the compliance branch, local district directors to decide on a firm’s regulatory outcome. The FDA mandates a strict response time—15 days—for an audited company to reply after a 483 is issued. The FDA should also be held to a 60- or 90-day turnaround.

As a former FDA inspector, I’ve been there. Some of the cases I was involved with took 24 months to get a final warning letter decision. This is unacceptable because there is a six-month follow-up that should be conducted.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us