{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Is Your Medical Device ‘State of the Art?’

Chances are it is, despite what some Notified Bodies have declared

Tue, 06/03/2014 - 11:33
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Not knowing the answer to the question posed in the title of this article has led many medical device manufacturers to undertake expensive and unnecessary retesting of their previously certified products.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Annex 1 of the “Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC—Essential Requirements—Section 2,” the directive states, “The solutions adopted by the manufacturer for the design and construction of the devices must conform to safety principles, taking account of the generally acknowledged state of the art.”

But what is “state of the art?” Many companies were mistakenly told that “state of the art” meant using the latest standards. Even though most of their devices had a perfect safety record and exemplary records of clinical performance, they were expected to meet newer, basic safety standards, including IEC 60601-1 3rd edition. Incidentally, this was done despite frequent notice from the European Commission to Notified Bodies that such an interpretation of “state of the art” was incorrect.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/19/2019 - 00:04

Very well written. Provide

Very well written. Provide insgihts to Medical device and regulation. Interesting article to read. Take about 15 mins

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us