That’s fake news. Real news COSTS. Please turn off your ad blocker for our web site.
Our PROMISE: Our ads will never cover up content.
Michael Causey
Published: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 - 11:43 Sure, the Italians have better food, the English richer royal culture and accents, and French women don’t get fat, but we in America regulate medical devices better, don’t we? Not so fast, says the European Union. They apparently aren’t happy that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is writing internal reports and making public remarks saying medical devices, especially high-risk ones, aren’t regulated so well in Europe, according to an internal report quoted in the Star Tribune and also reported over at the Regulatory Affairs Professional Society (RAPS). British attorney Paul Ranson told me (with that accent) that the European Union generally thinks it is already doing a nice job regulating medical devices, thank you very much. “Not in a self-congratulatory way, but I think the sense in the European Union is that they are doing it very well,” Ranson says. And while it’s not the British way to brag, he also allowed that the European Union is working on revising its medical device regulations now in an attempt to improve harmonization and centralization, among other issues. But he called these changes—expected to be unveiled this summer—to be more like “tweaks and not revolutionary” changes. “The intention behind the revisions is to improve and strengthen the directives and to meet growing expectations of European citizens,” Ranson says. “The current directives do not offer a uniform level of protection of public health in the European Union and new and emerging technologies have challenged the current directives. In addition, the revisions aim to simplify the directives, delivering a transparent system whereby citizens can be confident in the safety of medical devices.” As noted in the RAPS piece, EU officials have fired back at FDA personnel who’ve disparaged their regulatory regime. As I and others have written elsewhere, many in the medical device industry wish the FDA would take some pages from the EU’s regulatory book. Or put another way, the medical device industry wishes the FDA would cut out a lot of the pages in its long regulatory book and adapt more to the relatively streamlined approach in the European Union. I don’t care what anyone says. I’m going to have some Freedom fries for lunch tomorrow and wash it down with some sparkling San Pelligrino water while reading my favorite Graham Greene novel. This article first appeared in the April 26, 2012, issue of the AssurX blog. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, James Michael Causey’s been a journalist since he started his own neighborhood newspaper in the 1970s. In addition to quizzing FDA officials for the past 10+ years, he’s also interviewed political satirist Art Buchwald, FCC Chairman Reed Hundt, SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro, and is the past president of the Washington Independent Writers. Causey is the editor and publisher of eDataIntegrityReport.com and is a contributing writer on the AssurXblog.FDA and EU Spar on Medical Device Regulation
Just paying attention, says FDA; that’s hypervigilence, counters EU
Paul Ranson
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Michael Causey
© 2022 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.