{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Has Your Organization Contracted Humpty Dumpty Syndrome?

Functional separation of work is one reason why process improvement is so futile

Tripp Babbitt
Wed, 02/06/2013 - 11:05
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

The rhyme we all learned as children rings in my ears: Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall / Humpty Dumpty had a great fall / All the king’s horses and all the king’s men couldn’t put Humpty together again. I like to use Humpty Dumpty to describe companies that have functionally separated their work. These companies group similar tasks together, which shatters any cohesive workflow. For service industries especially, this can be extremely counterproductive.

ADVERTISEMENT

My British colleagues describe this as “functional specialisms.” I call it the Humpty Dumpty Syndrome. Regardless, the functional separation of work has long penetrated the design of most organizations. Functional separation is in our DNA. Frederick Winslow Taylor and proponents of scientific management introduced this design of breaking work into functions and optimizing the pieces. Scientific management theory was a breakthrough—100 years ago. A century later our work structures are still designed in the same way except that modern organizations grapple with information technology (IT) more often than physical layout.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by shrikale on Tue, 02/12/2013 - 10:28

Systems cannot be understood by analysis

As Dr. Russell L. Ackoff put it: It isn't the actions of the parts, but their interactions that matter. But, that has been a very difficult lesson to learn as we're not designed to think in terms of interactions (non-linear). We seem to be naturally wired for and then systematically programmed to think linearly using analytical techniques.

(Shrikant Kalegaonkar, twitter: @shrikale, LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/shrikale/)

  • Reply

Submitted by ZAK on Fri, 02/15/2013 - 12:02

Outsourcing function has

Outsourcing function has emerged to bring in more specialization of functions in the organization.

It aims to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.

Organizational thus thins out and it reduces the management layers.

This has evolved as contemporary successful model that helps management in focusing the core functions and specialized segments.

Once the outsourcing is done, processes should be re-engineered to support the new business model as well IT systems should be upgraded with sufficient previliges to the customer support empowering them to resolve issues and problems.

May be processes re-engineering and ITIL should be the focus instead of status quo and reverting back to the functional design.

I suggest that we really need data to support the premise that this is sub-optimization.

  • Reply

Submitted by Tripp Babbitt on Sat, 02/16/2013 - 18:15

In reply to Outsourcing function has by ZAK

Outsourcing

Hi Zak- I have heard this argument many times. I am afraid it doesn't have any merit in reality. A piece of data to compile to help you is the amount of failure demand coming in from customers. I have never found it less than 60% in any service organization. It is important to understand that redesign should happen BEFORE outsourcing, otherwise you are outsourcing your waste. An expensive proposition. Besides outsourcing contracts tend to lock-in the waste. Regards, Tripp
  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us