{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Unification: The Key to Improving Organizational Culture

Even top performers can improve when working in a group

Angelo Lyall
Wed, 04/06/2011 - 05:30
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Story update 4/07/2011: A reference to Rick Nash was changed to John Forbes Nash.

In 1776 Adam Smith claimed that the best result comes from everyone in the group doing what’s best for themselves. During the early 1950s, John Forbes Nash revised Adam Smith’s claim and stated that the best result comes from everyone in the group doing what’s best for themselves and the group. It took us 174 years of examination to realize that an individual in a group often attains the best possible outcome for himself not by a segregated pursuit of the outcome, but through a unified sense of purpose and a cooperative effort for accomplishing it. Let it not be another 174 years until we understand the cultural implications of this claim for organizations and the people that they are composed of.

ADVERTISEMENT

Establishing a desired culture within an organization is a complex task.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by wchorn on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 11:21

Rick? Nash

I believe Adam Smith's theory was improved by John Forbes Nash, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1994 for his improvement.  Rick Nash is a first class left winger for the Columbus Blue Jackets, but I don't think economics is his strong suit.

  • Reply

Submitted by Angelo Lyall on Thu, 04/07/2011 - 06:04

John Nash

Thank you for the comment, and you're absolutely correct.  I must be watching too much sports!  I've emailed quality digest to make the name correction.  Thanks again for bringing it to my attention.  I hope that you enjoyed the article aside from my oversight.

Angelo Lyall

  • Reply

Submitted by its the proces… on Fri, 04/08/2011 - 09:14

it's not the people, it's the process

I applaud Angelo for addressing an important element of any organization, but I have to take exception of his analysis of why one orchestra sounds better than another.  He writes: "What is it that one conductor does that makes the performance noticeably better than the other? The answer is simple yet profound... The successful conductor unifies the group..."  

 The answer is too simple!  I have an associates degree in music, and have been playing my instrument in various settings since 1975.   First of all, there can't be "equally" talented musicians - everything has variation.  Secondly, Deming tried to teach us that it's the process!  I'm sure group unity is part of the equation, but that's oversimplifying it, to say the least.  There are many processes in producing a great orchastra - the unity of the group that is shaped/created by the conductor is only one.  And then there are the processes that make one conductor better at unifying than another...  It's the process, don't forget.

    That's my 2 cents, thanks for listening.  Ken B

  • Reply

Submitted by Angelo Lyall on Wed, 04/13/2011 - 11:57

Response To: It's The Process

Ken B,

First, my genuine thanks for taking the time to read and comment on my paper.  Your comments are met with acceptance from myself and my camp here at Kaizen Solutions.  I believe that perhaps there is some failure on my part in my articulation.  I very much agree that the performance of a group such as an orchestra is determined by many things, not simply the leader.  What I do firmly believe, is that the leader's necessary role is to unify the group, in order to generate a cohesive sense of purpose and a unified vision.  While ultimately performance is a result of many factors, the positive influence that the leader can have is strongly connected to his or her ability to unify the group.  Translated to business, leaders must recognize and embrace this role.  Certainly, the Marketing function must perform it's own role well, but in order for it to do so, it must intimately understand the organization's purpose.  Likewise, if contribution is to be gained at the process level for any process, those contributions will lead to the greatest performance improvement when they are guided by that same depth of understanding of purpose.  "This is who we are, this is why we do what we do, this is how we uniquely exercise our business, and this is why customers choose us."  From marketing to the shop floor, a unified sense of purpose that originates with Leadership allows for the performance of the whole.  Demming did teach us about process, but more importantly processes in the context of the system.  I think that we likely do have similar views on this topic, but I seem to have failed in my articulation.  It has been a pleasure to pause for reflection and to share ideas with you.   Again, my sincerest thanks.

Angelo

Angelo Lyall Kaizen Solutions Inc. Corporate Coach & Partner angelo@kaizenimprovement.ca www.kaizenimprovement.ca

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us