{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

The Next New Thing Is Here

Foolproof, can’t-fail quality management

David C. Crosby
Mon, 12/14/2009 - 16:23
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Is anyone performing total quality management (TQM) anymore? MIL-Q-9858A? Total cost of quality (TCQ)? Pert planning? Are there any one-minute managers around? Pareto? What about “up the organization?” Value analysis? Quality is free? They were all big things—in their day.

ADVERTISEMENT

We in the quality business are fickle. We change our minds a lot about the best way to manage quality. Sometimes we even change and then change back. Statistical process control (SPC) and statistical quality control had their day, but we lost interest. However, back in the 1980s—and thanks to Deming—SPC got new life and became the hottest next new thing. Now I see signs that SPC is on the wane again. When I joined the quality game, the big thing was TCQ and visibility. The quality manger had to report high enough to give the big boss visibility. TCQ and TQM came and went.

We always seem to be looking for the next big thing. Why is that?

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Ken Berger on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 13:16

Zero Defects is just "sloganeering"

see above.

  • Reply

Submitted by Ken Berger on Fri, 12/18/2009 - 13:16

Zero Defects is just "sloganeering"

With all respect to Mr. Crosby, the only probelm with Zero defects is variation, which is in every process, and as Deming says, 94% of problems are a result of the system, the process, not the people working in the system. Here's a brief excerpt of Deming's persepecitve on ZD: "In his book, Out of the Crisis (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, second edition, 1986), renowned quality guru W. Edwards Deming took issue with the concept of zero defects, deriding it as an example of management sloganeering with little meaning for the worker on the shop floor. Part of Deming’s argument stems from the idea that rating workers is nearly impossible--even if a bottom-line measurement such as defects is used. As proof, Deming offered his now-famous red bead experiment,..." taken from an earlier Quality Digest article: http://www.qualitydigest.com/april05/articles/05_article.shtml. It's the process, not the people!

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us