{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

How AI Trends Can Drive Quality Management Systems

Life science companies can improve efficiency and reduce errors while keeping humans involved

As the road map for AI adoption in a QMS continues to unfold, teams must stay informed about emerging technologies and trends. Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash

Mike King
Mon, 07/29/2024 - 12:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Historically, the sensitive nature of personal and company proprietary information held in life sciences quality management systems (QMS) has been a factor for quality management teams’ reluctance to adopt AI. Add to that the complex global regulatory environment and the penalties of noncompliance, and this disinclination increases as the quality management teams work to reduce risk.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, as AI’s capabilities and benefits, along with technologies such as machine learning (ML), generative AI (GenAI), and large language models (LLM) become more compelling, quality management teams are considering them to improve productivity and efficiency, reduce errors and duplication of effort, and empower industry professionals in their day-to-day activities.

An initial resistance

Initially, quality management teams were reluctant to adopt AI due to concerns about handling sensitive personal information. Two significant factors contributed to this.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by John M. Cachat (not verified) on Mon, 07/29/2024 - 09:10

Human experience provides critical context that engines lack.

Human experience provides critical context that engines lack. Well said.  When me moved from slide rules to calculators, a human still needed to be involved.  AI/ML is a tool, like a calculator.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us