{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Use the Context in Your Data to Enable Process Improvement

To understand the signals in your data you need to know how they were collected

"in context" Credit: Erin Brown-John

Scott A. Hindle
Thu, 03/10/2022 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

In 2010, new to the world of statistical process control (SPC), I was intrigued by Don Wheeler’s statement that “No data have meaning apart from their context” (from his book, Understanding Variation—The Key to Managing Chaos, SPC Press, 2000, available on Amazon). For a while, I didn’t really get the importance of this message.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now, some years later, and working mainly to support manufacturing processes, data analysis for me begins in context and ends in context. Moreover, communicating the results to others is driven by context, and the simpler this is done the better. To see an example, read on.

Time order of production

All, or practically all, manufacturing data have an essential piece of context, which is a time stamp. It’s the time stamp that allows you to put your data in a logical sequence—the time order of production—when you start the analysis.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Scott A. Hindle on Mon, 03/14/2022 - 02:05

Potential capability

“Potential” capability: The limits in figure 1 provide an approximation* of the capability to expect IF, and only IF, the assignable causes in this process are identified and effectively controlled.

The “IF” here is key:  Without action on the assignable causes this “potential” capability has no meaning.  Note the elephant in the room:  No predictability = No actual process capability.

In this example, and because action on the assignable causes was planned, and did happen, the useful information in the potential capability was this: Achieve a predictable process and a capable process shall be expected. (This is because the limits in figure 1, 43.3-46.9, fall inside the specification range of 42.5 to 47.5.)

*This approximation is essentially an upper bound, but this point is secondary in the bigger picture of what capability means for an unpredictable process.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us