{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Optical Illusions, Zen Koans, and Simpson’s Paradox

Pay close attention to the statistics behind the curtain

Patrick Runkel
Tue, 10/15/2013 - 11:09
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

What do you see when you look at the image in figure 1? Do you see a bulging sphere that stretches the checkerboard pattern in the center, causing its lines to curve?

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you sure? Look again. This time, test any “curved” line by holding a straightedge next to it.


Figure 1: Curved lines or straight?

The image is actually composed of small squares and straight lines. Yet, when perceived as a composite whole, it creates a completely different impression.

A similar “illusion” can occur when you analyze your data. It’s called the Yule-Simpson effect—or Simpson’s paradox for short.

When you look at the overall results of all your data, you see one thing. But when you look at its smaller subgroups, your conclusions are reversed.

It’s easy to be hoodwinked by this sneaky statistical illusion.

“When many are reduced to one, to what is the one reduced?”
—Zen koan

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by umberto mario tunesi on Thu, 10/17/2013 - 21:09

zen koaning

How would statistics explain Giffen's paradox that the more a merchandise is sold, the higher goes its price?

  • Reply

Submitted by prunkel on Mon, 10/21/2013 - 07:11

In reply to zen koaning by umberto mario tunesi

Interesting question

There are, apparently, mathematical models that attempt to explain why, at times, consumer demand for a product rises as its price goes up, defying common supply-demand logic. Japanese researchers performed statistical analysis of data on household expenditures and found that Giffen's paradox occured with the consumption of shochu--an alcoholic drink. They theorized that this paradoxical effect was likely due to the limited income of consumers, who stopped buying even more expensive items (in this case, Japanese sake) and substituted the cheaper shochu for it (even though shochu prices had also risen).  http://wis-wander.weizmann.ac.il/institute-mathematicians-define-economic-paradox 

 

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us