{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Improve, Redesign, or Walk Away

Understand which performance outcomes are important before you begin

Alan Nicol
Wed, 08/28/2013 - 15:31
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

There seems to be doubt about the real potential of process improvement methods. This is a repeated theme in blog comments, emailed questions, and discussions about various process and business improvement methodologies. Can we really improve processes to an optimal level, or can a process only be improved to a limited degree before it must be completely scrapped or reinvented? Does the benefit of incremental process improvement really outweigh its cost?

ADVERTISEMENT

I’ve been reluctant to invite discussion or venture an opinion about this theme for a long time, primarily because its waters run deep. It’s not a simple discussion. However, today I’m feeling brave, or inspired, or foolish, so I thought I’d broach the subject.

Let me address the most pessimistic arguments doubting process improvement payoff. They could be summed up as: “The effort and cost to change culture, train personnel, win over resistance to change, alter processes, and otherwise incrementally improve according to a structured methodology, which is really just a fad, are too great and a waste of time.”

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Rajohnson on Wed, 09/04/2013 - 13:06

it is what you believe...

Great article.  I have seen many efforts reflect the theme of "It is what you believe..."

It has applied in transferring improvement tools and methodologies from design to programming to manufacturing to office processes.  It has applied in the boundary between incremental evolutionary improvements to radical revolutionary improvement. Even with the fearsome daunting task of children accomplishing homework!

At every bend, at every challenge, the "can" or "cannot" has always proven true.  Many times the "cannot" has masqueraded as "capital restrictions" or (from regulated industries) "regulatory/compliance restrictions"

Keep believing and keep doing!

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us