{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

The Balanced Scorecard: Issues and Resolution

There's a better means to address the economic challenges of the day.

Forrest Breyfogle—New Paradigms
Wed, 10/14/2009 - 12:52
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

The balanced scorecard is a commonly used vehicle that is to align organizational-chart work efforts to executive-determined strategies and goals.  With this approach, strategic planning could be considered as step one in this overall business-management-system process.

Consider now the true needs of a business. For success, it is important that organizations move toward achievement of the three Rs of business—everyone doing the right things, doing them right, and at the right time.  However, is a strategic approach an effective methodology for achievement of this three-Rs objective? Could there be a better means to address the economic challenges of the day through the implementation of an enhanced business-management system?

When answering the first question, consider issues resulting from a traditional approach:

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Tripp Babbitt on Mon, 10/26/2009 - 16:13

Balanced Scorecard

We have never found the balanced scorecard to be either helpful or useful. Command and control management with top-down metrics miss great opportunity for improvement AND add to the burgeoning waste of measures that are worthless. As long as companies continue down this path, improvement is far from the important customer-centric measures.

We find working with service organizations that understanding customer purpose and designing against customer demand offers the biggest lever for improvement. This requires different and (our opinion) better thinking.

Tripp Babbitt
www.newsystemsthinking.com

  • Reply

Submitted by Alan Meekings on Tue, 10/27/2009 - 05:19

In reply to Balanced Scorecard by Tripp Babbitt

Forrest Breyfogle on Balanced Scorecard

I agree with Tripp Babbit.

I think this article by Forrest Breyfogle is both confusing and misleading.

Alan

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us