Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Standards Features
Harish Jose
Using OC curves to generate reliability/confidence values
Phanish Puranam
Instead of blindly adopting industry best practice, companies can pilot new organizational designs
William A. Levinson
All is not gold that glitters
Grant Ramaley
IAF CertSearch now mandatory for accredited certification bodies
Megan Wallin-Kerth
MasterControl’s Matt Lowe talks competition, data, and what quality does for a company

More Features

Standards News
June 6, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern
Ensuring product consistency, quality, and adherence to federal and state standards
Omnex webinar on May 11, 2023
Digital Twin Consortium’s white paper guides strategies for building owners and stakeholders
Copper, titanium, and 304L stainless-steel powders from Desktop Metal have qualified for production
Webinars cover Automotive SPICE and carbon neutrality standards
Creates one of the most comprehensive regulatory SaaS platforms for the industry

More News

Dawn Bailey

Standards

How Baldrige Complements ISO 9001:2015

The Criteria, like the standard, help organizations serve customers better

Published: Monday, January 5, 2015 - 01:00

According to a recent IndustryWeek article, the 2015 edition of ISO 9001, the standard on quality management systems, is nearing completion.

The new version of IOS 9001 will have three areas of focus:

1. The process approach will be strongly emphasized; that is, the quality management system has to be woven into and fully aligned with the organization’s strategic direction
2. Superimposed on the system of processes is the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) methodology, which will apply both to individual processes as well as the quality management system as a whole
3. An overall focus on risk-based thinking aims at “preventing undesirable outcomes,” such as nonconforming products and services

At the Baldrige Program, we’ve interviewed several experts on the complementary usage of ISO and the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence, including Luis Calingo (“Better Than ISO? How Baldrige Benefits Manufacturers“) and Ron Schulingkamp (“Baldrige and ISO QMS: A Complementary Relationship“).

To me, the 2015 ISO focus concepts are reminiscent of the Baldrige Criteria. The Criteria guide an organization to align work systems and learning initiatives, as well as core competencies, with its strategic directions as part of planning. In fact, the Criteria build alignment across the organization by making connections and reinforcing measures derived from processes and strategy.

In the Criteria, PDCA is called out as a common process-improvement approach within category 6. A key element of this category is improving processes to achieve better performance—better quality from customers’ perspectives, and better financial and operational performance. In fact, the learning that comes from PDCA is key to how the Criteria are used to evaluate processes. The Criteria encourage organizations to choose the tools (e.g., ISO, PDCA) that are most suitable and effective for an organization in making improvements.

Measuring product performance (e.g., defect levels, service errors) is part of Criteria item 7.1. Such product and operational performance results demonstrate product and service quality and value that lead to customer satisfaction and engagement.

The Criteria also cover risk-based thinking—intelligent risks, a concept introduced in the 2013–2014 Criteria, which state: “Identifying strategic opportunities and intelligent risks is part of strategy, and pursuing the intelligent risks must be embedded in managing organizational operations.” Innovation can result from such pursuit; the Criteria encourage organizations to use creative, adaptive, and flexible approaches to foster incremental and breakthrough improvement through innovation.

In what ways do you think that the 2015 ISO 9001 edition and the Baldrige Criteria will be complementary?

First published Dec. 11, 2014, at Blogrige.

Discuss

About The Author

Dawn Bailey’s picture

Dawn Bailey

Dawn Bailey is a writer/editor for the Baldrige Program involved in all aspects of communications, from leading the Baldrige Executive Fellows program to managing the direction of case studies, social media efforts, and assessment teams. She has more than 25 years of experience (18 years at the Baldrige Program) working on publications and education teams. Her background is in English and journalism, with degrees from the University of Connecticut and an advanced degree from George Mason University.