It’s More Than the Mean That Matters

Using intervals to get at the tail ends of the problem

Cheryl Pammer

June 7, 2018

Confidence intervals show the range of values we can be fairly, well, confident, that our true value lies in, and they are very important to any quality practitioner. I could be 95-percent confident the volume of a can of soup will be 390–410 ml. I could be 99-percent confident that less than 2 percent of the products in my batch are defective.

Demonstrating an improvement to the process often involves proving a significant improvement in the mean, so that’s what we tend to focus on—the center of a distribution.

Defects don’t fall in the center, though. They fall in the tails. You can find more beneficial insights in many situations through examining the tails of the distribution rather than just focusing on the mean.

Let’s take a look at some nontraditional confidence intervals that are particularly useful in estimating the percent that fall inside or outside the specification limits.

Figure 1: Estimating the 99th percentile on time to complete hospital lab work. Probability plot generated with Minitab Statistical Software.

A probability plot is most often used to help you determine whether your data follow a normal distribution (based on how linear the points appear to be). It provides a good starting point for understanding percentiles. A percentile is the value at which a given percentage of the population is estimated to fall below.

But did you know probability plots also provide estimates of the percentiles of the distribution? You can choose any percentile you want on the Y axis and find the corresponding data value on the X axis. The corresponding confidence intervals on the probability plot are confidence intervals for the specific percentile.

I was recently working on a project with a hospital that needed to estimate within how many minutes 99 percent of its pre-surgery lab work falls.

The X value corresponding to Y = 99 on the probability plot was 204 minutes. In other words, 99 percent of all pre-lab work should be complete by 204 minutes.

The confidence interval around the estimate indicated that we could be 95-percent confident that 99 percent of the lab work would be complete by 171–244 minutes. This explained why the surgeries were often falling behind schedule.

Figure 2: Tolerance interval plot generated with Minitab Statistical Software.

Although percentiles estimate the percent of observations that fall below a certain value, tolerance intervals provide a range that you can be confident a certain percentage will fall between.

They are very useful for determining where a certain percentage of the population will fall relative to your specification limits.

For example, a medical device company I was working with needed to show 95/99 reliability on the tensile strength of plastic tubing. The specific requirement was that it needed to be 95-percent confident that the tubing would withstand 3 lbs of force for 99 percent of product.

Like the hospital data, these data were non-normal. Because a tolerance interval estimates what is going on in the tails of the distribution—not the mean—the distribution assumption is important. Here, an extreme value distribution provided a good distribution fit. Because the tubing could not be too strong, a one-sided tolerance limit, a lower bound, was appropriate. The value of the 99-percent lower tolerance bound with 95-percent confidence was 10.7 lbs. In other words, we could be 95-percent confident that 99 percent of the tubing population has a tensile strength of at least 10.7 lbs—well above the specification limit of e lbs.

Percentiles vs. tolerance

Consider using confidence intervals on percentiles or tolerance intervals the next time you are interested in interval estimation involving the tails of a distribution:
• Percentiles estimate the value that a given percentage of the population falls below.
• Tolerance intervals estimate the range of measurements a given percentage of the population will fall within.

About The Author

Cheryl Pammer’s picture

Cheryl Pammer

As the lead designer of Minitab 18 and a Minitab trainer and consultant, Cheryl Pammer draws on over 25 years of experience and an M.S. in Statistics from Pennsylvania State University to provide sound statistical strategies and software tools that professionals need to solve the real-world challenges they face. You can see her speak on incorporating modern predictive analytics into a continuous improvement project at the Minitab Insights 2018 conference.