Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Risk Management Features
Gleb Tsipursky
Three tips to help you avoid the planning fallacy
Ryan McKenna
Guest author from academia walks us through considerations and tools available to conduct this type of analysis with differential privacy
Arron Angle
Behavior-based quality: How do you act when no one is looking?
Christopher Allan Smith
Let that sink in—or how planning for disaster sometimes isn’t enough
James Wells
If the solution is obvious, just do it!

More Features

Risk Management News
Address equipment issues before a catastrophic failure occurs
Higher quality contributes to higher efficiency and less downtime
Design, develop, implement, continually improve risk management in systems and software engineering
ISO/IEC/IEEE 16085 has just been updated
Galileo’s Telescope describes how to measure success at the top of the organization, translate down to every level of supervision
NSF-funded project is developing a model to help manufacturers pivot and produce personal protective equipment
How to develop an effective strategic plan and make the best major decisions in the context of uncertainty and ambiguity
What continual improvement, change, and innovation are, and how they apply to performance improvement
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth

More News

Risk Management

Averting a Plane Crash

What to do about the global pilot shortage

Published: Thursday, January 17, 2019 - 13:02

The world is running out of experienced pilots. Supply is not keeping up with the growing demand for air travel. In Australia, the effects are already starting to bite. Even flagship carrier Qantas is having problems. In recent months it has had to perform a very nimble tap dance to crew its vast fleet and maintain its extensive flight schedule.

In response, Qantas has plans for one of the biggest pilot training programs in its history. It has just announced that its first-ever pilot training academy, training 250 pilots a year, will be based in Toowoomba, Australia. A second site, to train a similar number of pilots, is still to be announced.

Training these many pilots, though, will be a struggle. The academy will first have to find enough instructional pilots to deliver the required training flights.

Ruptured training pipelines

The reason airlines and other operators are in this predicament stems from the rupturing of the training pipelines that historically supplied pilots across all levels of the aviation industry.

Experience is everything in aviation. Qantas and Australia’s other major carriers—Virgin Australia, Tiger and Jetstar—have mostly employed pilots with high levels of flying experience. Pilots gained that experience flying for regional airlines, charter operators, and critically, as instructors at flight training schools.

As pilots gained experience and progressed to more lucrative flying positions, newly qualified pilots were employed to replace them. Together with a trickle of ex-military pilots topping up the airlines, the whole system had sat more or less in equilibrium.

Reaching a tipping point

This equilibrium has been at tipping point for some time. Almost a decade ago (in 2009) a government white paper predicted the training system would fail without remedial action.

Some measures were put in place, but not enough. Most of the weaknesses went uncorrected. It was only because of the global financial crisis, which suppressed global demand for air travel, that crisis was delayed.

A leading indicator of system failure is a dearth of available experienced trainers, as flying school instructors move into airline employment. Without these instructors, flight schools struggle to train new pilots to feed the industry from the bottom up.

In Australia there is no mechanism to maintain this vital pool of flight instructors. There are no formalized career pathways and minimal financial support to those looking to teach others to fly. A bespoke airline-training scheme won’t remedy the problem if its pilots all go straight into the airline’s employ.

Taking care of training pathways

In the United States, the system is somewhat different. Despite substantial evidence to show that airline cadetship programs posed no negative impact to flight safety, in 2013, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration chose to stipulate a substantial minimum level of experience a pilot must have to be employed by a major airline.

Although this has exacerbated the pilot shortage issue for U.S. airlines, it has also forced the industry to create formal pathways to train new pilots and help freshly qualified pilots progress to an airline career. Such pathways often include a period of employment as a flying instructor.

A similar “instructing pathway” needs to be a central part of Australia’s airline training programs if they are going to be sustainable. Government also has a role to play, as noted by the expert panel charged with recommending strategies for a sustainable and successful aviation training sector in Australia. A key issue is education funding.

Sky-high student costs

The cost to become a commercial pilot is comparable to that of becoming a doctor or a veterinarian. A university-trained commercial pilot with a flight-instructor rating will pay more than AUS$140,000 in fees.

But unlike those doing medicine or veterinary science courses, trainee pilots have never been adequately assisted by federal student subsidy and loan schemes such as HECS, FEE-HELP, or VET student loans.

Recent amendments to Australia’s Higher Education Support Act cap the maximum debt a student can have under the Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) at AUS$104,440. The only exceptions are medicine, dentistry, and veterinary science, where the cap is AUS$150,000.

This effectively means students wanting to undertake a flight training degree need to find close to AUS$35,000 upfront. The effect will be profound. Many talented potential pilots will not be able to pursue the career.

Over the horizon

Looking further into the future, we must find more ways to maintain the pilot training pipeline. Encouraging more female and indigenous students to pursue the career would be a start. The numbers now are woefully low.

Finally, the entire process of pilot training needs to be made more effective and efficient. Practices have remained essentially unchanged since flight training began.

Our future training systems must make pragmatic use of learning technologies and theory to enhance student progression, reduce failure, and maximize the use of expensive aircraft resources. This requires investment.

In Canada, the training and simulation giant CAE, in partnership with the national and Quebec governments, is investing C$1 billion during the next five years to develop the next generation of aviation training systems.

In Australia we need to recognize this opportunity for innovation and act now, before our pilot training system completely crumbles.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


About The Authors

Stephen Fankhauser’s picture

Stephen Fankhauser

Stephen Fankhauser is the chair of the aviation d epartment at Swinburne University of Technology. His areas of expertise are in aviation technology and flight training.

Matt Ebbatson’s picture

Matt Ebbatson

Matt Ebbatson is the Aviation Postgraduate Course director in the Faculty of Science, Engineering & Technology at Swinburne University. has more than 10 years' experience engaging with the aviation industry to investigate and resolve human factors and safety related challenges in Britain, Australia and New Zealand.