{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

The Shocking Role of Support Areas

The three costliest are also the most wasteful

Tripp Babbitt
Thu, 04/25/2013 - 11:06
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

OK, brace yourself for a shocking disclosure that will revolutionize service businesses everywhere. Are you ready? The role of support areas such as human resources, IT, finance, and of course, management is to... wait for it... support the core business. And by core business I’m talking about those who deliver what customers want or solve customer problems.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now, on the surface that doesn’t sound too shocking, but actually support areas in a functionally separated organization rarely “support” anything. They are more like elected officials with mandates to enforce their will on the core business. After all, support areas have performance measures to meet, just like the production or service departments do, but typically these measurements have little to do with customer wants or problems.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by jimpepitone on Thu, 05/02/2013 - 15:55

We prove this everyday

Tripp,

I have followed your writing for a few years and marvel at your intrepid syle. As you suggest here and in other articles and blog posts, the opportunity for improved performance are virtually everywhere in most businesses, if only managers were willing to rethink the time-worn practices that now greatly limit both individual and enterprise performance.

Business isn't easy, and yet the fire fighting that consumes most managers is quite often (though unknowingly) of their own or their company's making. If they would only momentarily step out of the smoke and flames of day to day activity and take a systems perspective in order to see more clearly what's going on, the clarity this would provide could be the necessary first step on their path to more effective operations and more enjoyable work.

I've thought of commenting before, but your closing comment in this article made it necessary. You say, "Better designed work always improves performance." At DesignedWORK (www.designedwork.com), we prove this everyday.

Best wishes on your continued success.

Jim Pepitone, Managing Partner (james.pepitone@designedwork.com) and (www.linkedin.com/in/drjimpepitone/)

 

  • Reply

Submitted by umberto mario tunesi on Fri, 05/03/2013 - 01:28

Supporting Supporters

Just reading some History, I would like to quote four recognized leaders: Enrico Mattei, Epaminondas, William T. Sherman, George S. Patton. All of them were quite unfortunate in their adventures and, while the latter three fought their battles on battlefields, the former fought his battles at stock-exchange level. But they were all in favor of effectively using local resources, they were all against any kind of "colonialism", they were all very close to their combatants, they fought among them. Colonialism doesn't only meaning managing or exploiting "colonies", it also means make a "colony" out of any industrial / economical process, and of its people, who deserve instead full independence. Thank you. 

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us