{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Education: Preparing the Next-Generation Workforce, Part Two

Continuous improvement in education requires monitoring

Thomas R. Cutler
Rich McGrath
Wed, 05/16/2012 - 10:34
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Editor’s note: This is the second article of a multipart series about the role of quality in education and its effect on workforce development. In part one of the series, the role of accountability was detailed and profiled.

The well-established quality control mechanisms and processes used in business for more than two decades are now infiltrating academia. Rather than quality control professionals, accountability directors are assuming the functions of ensuring best practices in schools. Where business refers to continuous process improvement, the education model refers to monitoring.

ADVERTISEMENT

Based on the voluminous mandates and initiatives from local school districts and state and federal governments as required by No Child Left Behind, schools are attempting to quickly respond with strategies that will improve students’ achievement test scores as well as skill sets in reading and math. Just as industry selects a process strategy, such as lean Six Sigma, education models use similar methods to select and assess the efficacy of their solutions.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Franrahl on Fri, 05/25/2012 - 18:20

Metrics in education

All the professional educators I know describe "no child left behind" as a fraud. All claim that for their survival, teachers must teach the tests. That leaves no time for critical thinking and other skills necessary for a true education. I am teaching in a masters program at a prestegious university and find that my students have passed all the secondary school tests, only to come to me unable to construct a proper sentence.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us