{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Plan vs. Actual Math

The challenge lies in the discipline and problem solving

Lean Math With Mark Hamel
Wed, 06/04/2014 - 11:54
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
Body

The plan vs. actual chart is one of the most powerful and simple visual process performance metrics. In fact, it’s a sort of Swiss Army knife of charts in that it not only provides insight into process performance but also, by the virtue of its comment field, begs and shares information as to when and why there is a variance from the plan. Ultimately, it is about problem identification.

ADVERTISEMENT

The chart is often positioned at the pacemaker process or at the output end of a line or cell (which can be the same thing). It goes by a number of different names: production analysis board, day-by-the-hour chart, ahead or beyond chart, production control board.

Typically, the discrete time increments reflected on the chart are hourly, but this is not always appropriate, depending on the takt image (i.e., pitch) of the process. The plan should reflect the customer demand as communicated by a preset schedule, or when the resource is scheduled by downstream pull signals, the actual pulled quantity serves as the plan. In any event, the plan quantities are intended to reflect and accommodate takt time and, when appropriate, afford for standard internal changeover times.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us