Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Quality Insider Features
Chris Fox
Rediscovering the mother of all innovation—necessity
Grant Ramaley
Verify ISO QMS certificates using the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) CertSearch database
Drew Calvert
Should firms be required to disclose the negative social impacts of their suppliers?
Innovating Service With Chip Bell
When customers release their imagination to resolve a problem, everyone benefits
MIT News
They can quickly learn to optimize building microclimates for both energy consumption and user preference

More Features

Quality Insider News
An advanced wireless data collection system for acquiring precision measurement data
Realistic variations in glossiness could aid fine art reproduction and the design of prosthetics
All of the manufacturer’s X-ray sources are supported including rotating target technology and 450kV microfocus source
Smart manufacturing includes recyclability and energy and waste reduction, leading to sustainability and cost savings
Ideal for measuring large components or multiple small components, quickly, easily, and accurately
Measure workpieces from 25 mm to 42.5 mm with a measuring range of ±100 µm and a repeatability of ≤0.1 µm
Contactless gauging system for measuring steel wire for tires, copper wire for electrical cables, CO2 welding wire, and more
Too often process enhancements occur in silos where there is little positive impact on the big picture

More News

Quality Transformation With David Schwinn

Quality Insider

On-the-Job Stress: A Disease in Search of a Cure

Diagnose the cause and write a prescription for treatment

Published: Monday, June 20, 2011 - 05:00

As I was recently going through some old papers, I came across a letter that my good friend and fraternity brother, Ron Sparling, and I had sent to the general manager of a General Motors Corp. (GM) division where another close friend and fraternity brother had worked.

Our fraternity brother, Mark Horvath, had died of a heart attack at the age of 39 after nearly a year-long stretch of new, high-stress job responsibilities. In our letter, we recognized that a simple cause-and-effect relationship between the stress and his death was, of course, impossible to establish. We also acknowledged that the problem was not unique to his division or to GM. We did, however, suggest that stress can affect health in a negative way and asked the general manager to look into that issue and try to reduce the job-related stress in his division.

Since then I don’t think things have changed much. As a matter of fact, they may have gotten worse, at least in the United States. That’s certainly what I read about and hear from people who currently hold the kind of jobs I held in those days. Many of my friends and colleagues, especially those in the for-profit world, speak of their 24-7 world where they must always seek balance and be aware of their health and the continually increasing demands put upon them. They speak of walking a razor’s edge between the risk of losing their jobs and losing their lives and families.

My guess is that many of you have stressful jobs, and perhaps some of you unintentionally contribute to the general stress level in your organizations. As we said in our letter those many years ago, people tend to deal with stress in different ways—some of us get headaches, some develop ulcers, some drink too much or take drugs, some lose their marriage and friends, and some of us die. Those are not good outcomes for us personally or for our organizations.

While the research seems sketchy, according to the findings in Organizational Behavior, by Stephen P. Robbins and Timothy A. Judge (Pearson Education/Prentice Hall, 2009), some short-term, moderate levels of stress can increase job performance; however, additional stress, especially over time, causes job dissatisfaction, anxiety, irritability, boredom, procrastination, and lower performance. These outcomes from additional stress suggest we may want to better control the level of stress on the job and our reactions to it.

Robbins and Judge recommend clear, achievable goals with a good feedback system to reduce stress on the job. They suggest providing additional employee control with increased responsibility, and more meaningful work and autonomy. They also recommend developing better organizational communication, and giving time off for sabbaticals and wellness programs.

Other suggestions, as in How Healthy Is Your Organization?: The Leader’s Guide to Curing Corporate Diseases and Promoting Joyful Cultures, by Imre Lövey and Manohar S. Nadkarni with Eszter Erdélyi (Praeger Publishers, 2007), are to ask employees about their concerns, acknowledge them, and act in response to those concerns. These three authors also tell a fun story about one executive who takes the time to construct brilliant e-mails during his 40-hour week and then saves them to send on the weekend, so he appears to be on the clock 24/7 while committing the weekends to his family.

As I consider telling my own reactions to on-the-job stress, I recall that I believe stress is grounded in some combination of each employee’s world view and the culture of the organization in which he operates. A person’s world view and organizational or even departmental cultures are hard to change. To begin with, they are frequently unacknowledged and even unknown. I’m not talking about the value statements posted on office walls or the perspectives that so glibly roll off our tongues when asked our opinions. I’m talking about the deeply held, almost-never-discussed beliefs we hold both individually and as organizations about how the world works. These, I think, are the beliefs that affect stress levels and how we behave.

Now I’m ready to tell you about how I have handled stress as a middle manager in the past. I am fortunate to say this has only happened a few times in my long career. When I have felt stressed, I have taken the additional time necessary to try to figure out the cause. In those days, I didn’t fully appreciate the power of culture and frequently made superficial suggestions about organizational behavior change. Once I had figured out that the organizational behavior was not about to change, I worked to move to another organization, maybe even within the larger company. I was always lucky enough to get out before I got fired. I believe W. Edwards Deming said, “Raise your hand three times, and you’re a marked man.” I was usually lucky. In hindsight, my timing may not have been good, but it all worked out for the better. An organization that creates unhealthy stress in our lives does not deserve our effort. As W. Edwards Deming advocated, our organizations should bring joy to our lives.

I hope this month’s column has been, at least, a little useful. Stress is everywhere these days. It need not be part of the workplace. Let’s do something about it. As always, I treasure your comments and questions. I’m at support@pqsystems.com.

Discuss

About The Author

Quality Transformation With David Schwinn’s picture

Quality Transformation With David Schwinn

David Schwinn, an associate of PQ Systems, is a full-time professor of management at Lansing Community College and a part-time consultant in the college’s Small Business and Technology Development Center. He is also a consultant in systems and organizational development with InGenius and INTERACT Associates.

Schwinn worked at Ford’s corporate quality office and worked with W. Edwards Deming beginning in the early 1980s until Deming’s death.  Schwinn is a professional engineer with an MBA from Wright State University. You can reach him at support@pqsystems.com.  

 

Comments

Interesting topic

Hi David,

I find this an interesting topic and I have the following idea about this:

1) Make one things your priority: - Either work to live, or live to work.  In short => Which is more important, your family or your career

2) Keep business and private separated. When you are at home, you are at home. When at work, you are at work. In order to do so, you need a stable home condition => Behind every successful man stands a strong woman is true. If your wife cannot handle the home situation and requires your time and attention throughout the working day, it will cause you lots of stress. At the other side, if she is able to leave you alone while you are working and can handle everything at home, you are worry free to perform your duties without negative impact to your stress or to your personal life

3) Get to piece with the following => Do the best you can. Accept all result when you gave it your 100%. Be unhappy when not giving your 100%.  Any good or bad outcome can be accept, if you did your best and made decisions for the right reasons. Out of that can result only one of two conclusions => You are good for your job, or you are not suitable for the job. If you are not suitable for the job when giving it your best, you need to find a other job. Trying to hold on to something you cannot handle, is what leads to the real stress. 

4) Already said at 3=> You can accept any outcome, when you gave it your best. Having real piece with your efforts should keep you stress free.

5) Keep work and private separate.  If you are busy at work with work 100% of the time, every one at your work will be happy with you.  If you are busy with your private life for 100% when you are at home, everyone will be happy at home.  It is when work is stealing private time in the eyes of the family, of when you are handling personal things at the office, this is when people start doubting your efforts and this is the moment you will get social stress.

Would love to know your fews on my suggested 'rules to avoid stress'