Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Quality Insider Features
Richard Harpster
Good news? You are probably already doing it.
Adam Zewe
Researchers find the root cause of side-channel attacks that are easy to implement but difficult to detect
Constance Noonan Hadley
The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork still outweigh the costs
Lily Chen
The cornerstone of cybersecurity
Jeremy L. Boerger
To keep your business running, you need visibility into your IT assets

More Features

Quality Insider News
New standard leads to smoother production in 3D printing
Making designs a physical reality with the know-how to make more
Sapphire XC will ship in late Q3 beginning with aerospace companies
Major ERP projects take six months longer than companies were told
Program inspires leaders to consider systems perspective for continuous improvement and innovation
Collaboration produces online software for collecting quality inspection data
Serving the needs of employers and educators
Powder reuse schemes affect medical device performance

More News

Jay Arthur—The KnowWare Man

Quality Insider

Improvement Projects for Services

Start now, but remember that you’re never done

Published: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 - 11:16

I am no longer surprised by the number of people who say, “I’m working on my Green Belt/Black Belt certification, but I’m not sure how to apply Six Sigma to [health care, telecom, hotels, food, transportation]—insert your service industry here. They just can’t seem to figure out how to translate manufacturing-oriented training and case studies to their industry. It’s not that difficult, but that’s what I do most of the time: help people translate the “map” used in manufacturing to their particular industry.

While manufacturing focuses on reducing variation (I call it “deviation” because it deviates from the customer’s requirements), services can best benefit by focusing on eliminating defects, mistakes, and errors in the service delivery process.

Where’s the pain?

 The first step is to identify the pain caused by defects, mistakes, and errors. Is it:
• Medication errors, hospital-acquired infections, surgical complications, ventilator-assisted pneumonia, repeat radiology or lab tests?
• Incorrect or inaccurate orders that lead to incorrect service delivery that leads to waste, rework, and lost profit?
• Inaccurate bills or invoices? Improperly applied payments? Denied insurance claims?
• Defects in delivered software?
• Preventable adjustments and credits?

Find the data

While define, measure, analyze, improve and control (DMAIC) lead most people to believe they need to start by defining and measuring something, data about the number or cost of these types of defects are already collected somewhere by someone. Find the data! As described in my previous article about Control Charts for Services, get the data into a format that can be graphed as a control chart.

Most corporate pain revolves around money: adjustments, credits, and and so on. Because Six Sigma focuses on cutting the cost of waste and rework, it’s often easiest to start with lost revenue or the cost of waste. Here’s an example of using the cost instead of a count of defects. This hospital system’s pain was denied insurance claims. I simply summarized and charted the monthly cost of denied claims.

The process was stable, so the hospital could plan on losing more than a million dollars a month. Until I combined the $100 denied here and the $1,000 denied there, it had no idea how much it was losing.

Mine the data

Once you know the level of pain, it’s time to start using Pareto charts to drill down. In this case, I started with various reason codes. Timely filing (i.e., not filing the claim within 30 days) was the main culprit.

But I rarely stop at the first level of Pareto chart. I drill down into the “big bar” to see if there’s a Pareto pattern within that. In this case, one insurer accounted for almost two-thirds of timely filing denials:

Create the problem statement and gather a SWAT team

Once the problem has been narrowed to the most granular level, it’s easy to write a problem statement. The “big bar” on the Pareto chart becomes the head of the fishbone diagram:
During 2002–2003, Insurer 1 accounted for 64 percent of denials for timely filing ($7,849,569), which was higher than desired and caused lost profit:

Most companies make the mistake of convening a team before they know what problem they are trying to solve. By narrowing the focus using data, it’s easy to figure out who should be on the team. After showing this analysis to the sponsor, she immediately identified the five people that should be on the root cause team.

This “SWAT team” of experts was able to diagnose the root causes and define countermeasures in fewer than four hours.

Implement and verify countermeasures

The team figured out the problem on a Friday and implemented changes to work around this particular insurer on Monday. Getting the insurer to comply with its contract took a while longer.

To verify that the countermeasures actually reduced the pain, add data to the control chart begun when finding the data. In this case, the change resulted in savings of almost $5 million per year:

Notice that this also reduced the variability in denied claims, which means fewer surprises from month to month.

Sustain the improvement

Where most improvement projects go wrong is during the control phase of DMAIC. Project teams forget to put a control system in place. So once the solution has been verified, just continue to use the control chart to monitor the cost or count of defects forever, and implement corrective actions when it goes out of control.


The team continued to work through other issues with rejected, appealed, and denied claims to save an additional $24 million.

Note: This project could have begun with the number of denied claims instead of the cost of denied claims and probably would have arrived at a similar answer, although sometimes the highest-volume defect is not the most expensive one.

Problem solving is easy

• Focus on the pain (defects or costs). If you don’t know what the pain is or where to find it, ask any manager or leader. They can usually tell you a half a dozen things that keep them up at night.
• Find the data (defects or costs)
• Control-chart the data to establish a baseline
• Laser-focus the analysis using Pareto charts
• Develop a problem statement
• Convene a SWAT team to analyze root causes
• Implement and verify countermeasures
• Repeat until the pain is gone
• Find a new source of pain and repeat the process

The good news is that you can start today; the bad news is that you are never done.



About The Author

Jay Arthur—The KnowWare Man’s picture

Jay Arthur—The KnowWare Man

Jay Arthur, speaker, trainer, founder of KnowWare International Inc., and developer of QI Macros for Excel, understands how to pinpoint areas for improvement in processes, people, and technology. He uses data to pinpoint broken processes and helps teams understand their communication styles and restore broken connections. Arthur is the author of Lean Six Sigma for Hospitals (McGraw-Hill, 2011), and Lean Six Sigma Demystified (McGraw-Hill, 2010), and QI Macros SPC Software for Excel. He has 30 years experience developing software. Located in Denver, KnowWare International helps service and manufacturing businesses use lean Six Sigma tools to drive dramatic performance improvements.