{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Evaluating a Gauge Study With One Part

You can find useful information about your measurement system

Marilyn Wheatley
Wed, 03/13/2013 - 11:02
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

ADVERTISEMENT

Recently, Minitab News featured an article that talked about how to perform a gauge repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) study with multiple operators and only one part. This prompted many users to contact Minitab’s technical support team with questions about next steps, such as: “What can I do with the output of a gauge study with only one part?” and “How can I use the variance component estimates to obtain meaningful information about my measurement system?”

ADVERTISEMENT

By themselves, the variance component estimates from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) output for a gauge study with just one part are not particularly useful. However, if we combine what we’ve learned about the variance for repeatability and reproducibility with some additional information, we can obtain a significant amount of information about our measurement system. We will also need to do some simple hand calculations.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by umberto mario tunesi on Mon, 03/18/2013 - 10:41

A basic question

Numbers aside, to tackle customers' complaints, Industry has got to move more and more to destructive testing of returned samples or of widgets they still have in store. Now, how can an R&R or ANOVA - based MSA be reliable for destructive testing? Even an apparently simple measurement like the melt flow rate of a plastic poly-propylene compound cannot be reliably repetated, nor reproduced, because heat modifies the polymer's molecules structure. "We bathe and don't bathe in the same river." Thank you.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us