Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Quality Insider Features
Jennifer V. Miller
Don’t write your company off just yet
Jennifer Lauren Lee
Solved at last
Harry Hertz
Right now, organizations have a unique opportunity to reconsider their work environment
Narayan Pant
It doesn’t have to be lonely at the top
Fred Miller
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture leads USDA-NIFA research partnership

More Features

Quality Insider News
Survey reveals effect of smart manufacturing technology
Allows end-users to bring 3D measurement close to the production line
Multimaterial 3D printer is integrated in the digital CAx process chain of Siemens NX
Strengthens data analysis and AI capability
Even nonprogrammers can implement complex test systems and standards
New e-book on quality system management now available for pre-order
Alliance will help processors in the US, Canada, and Mexico
Makes it easy to perform all process steps, from sample observation to data analysis

More News

Kyle Cahoon

Quality Insider

Comparing Quality Levels Between Machines, Parts, or Shifts

Analyzing these three can help identify improvement areas rather than tackling too many variables at once

Published: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 - 12:44

When work days (and nights) are spent conforming to customer compliance standards, investigating customer complaints, or struggling with data collection software, then finding time for continuous process improvement seems unrealistic if not impossible. Tasks pile up, demands increase, and products become more diverse. How do you find ways to create real value?

The first step is to look closely at how you are collecting data. Typically, quality data are sampled during the process to determine if the product (or part) is in compliance. These data are often appended to traceability information such as a lot, purchase order number, or work order number. This is the bare minimum required for satisfying customer needs or being able to respond to a recall. However, adding machine, part, and shift data to this set can make it more valuable.

Machine data

Ultimately, one or more machines are responsible for certain quality criteria that are measured on a given part. Capturing the machine as an identifier, such as asset number, rather than simply “Line 1” gives you increased resolution of the process. If machines are switched out, upgraded, or replaced, you can focus on the process performance of each one individually. This enables you to provide a more accurate benchmark of your process. Remember, the process can be defined how you see fit, and adding resolution to your data collection gives you more options.

Part data

You are probably collecting a “part” with your quality data, but you may want to consider adding more detail. For example, assign a work in progress part number at different stages of production. This will enable comparative analysis at multiple levels and give you greater resolution for recalls. It will also allow you to pinpoint with more certainty not only underperforming products but also specific problem areas within your process.

Shift data

There is always a human component to your process performance. Appending shift information to quality data is not the same as simply noting the time that a check was performed. Adding a shift indicator will allow you to aggregate data by shift, regardless of the specific date or time the data were collected. Try looking at the Cpk (a value in process capability calculation) of a given process/part/test combination. Now look at the same data, but by individual shift. What if the third shift’s performance yields a Cpk of 0.87, while the first shift yields 1.34? This could help you quickly identify issues such as understaffing or inadequate training.

Process improvement is all about collecting the right data so you can see your process not only at a high level but also with high resolution. Comparative analysis of quality data by machine, part, and shift can quickly identify areas to improve on rather than tackling too many variables at once. These three additions will make your quality data truly valuable.


About The Author

Kyle Cahoon’s picture

Kyle Cahoon

Kyle Cahoon is an application engineer at InfinityQS International. He provides customized implementations of InfinityQS products and leads fundamental training and follow-up consultations. Before coming to InfinityQS, Cahoon worked at J.Y. Engineering providing consultation on InfinityQS system development, and he integrated Manufacturing Pro and OPC data into InfinityQS, as well as creating automated management reports and portal based reports of InfinityQS data. Prior to J.Y. Engineering, Cahoon worked with Gorton’s Seafood where he implemented their InfinityQS pilot system. Cahoon has a bachelor’s degree in industrial engineering from Northeastern University, Boston. He also has experience in computer hardware, networking, SQL, and several programming languages.