Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Quality Insider Features
Laurel Thomas
Trust your co-worker, but remember its video camera is running
Andrei Vakulenko
3D scanning speeds custom product design
Ryan E. Day
FARO products help Composiflex deliver industry-leading service
Annette Franz
Valuable insights vs. misinformation
Vibhas Rattanjee
Choices should be designed for how people actually make decisions—instinctively and somewhat irrationally

More Features

Quality Insider News
Stereotactic robot helps identify target and deliver electrodes to target with submillimetric accuracy
GOM CT scanner offers highest accuracy and resolution of any 225kV system available today
Ability to subscribe with single-user minimum, floating license, and no long-term commitment
How the nation’s leading multistate cannabis company ensures quality and safety standards
Instantly separates surface texture into wavelength bands, displays data in highly intuitive, single-screen interface
46% of creative workers want video games in the office
A guide for practitioners and managers
Delivers production calibration and color profiling capabilities for the widest range of industrial print applications
Examine nine ways to help understand context, diffuse politics, heal relationships, and find the right work at the right time

More News

Paul Daniel

Quality Insider

Answer These Questions Before Starting a Mapping Validation Project

Five FAQs when bringing this competency in house

Published: Thursday, August 2, 2012 - 13:51

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) regulations tell us that we must identify the environmental conditions that can affect the strength, identity, safety, quality, and purity of our regulated products, whether they are pharmaceuticals, medical devices, or biologic products.

The FDA regulations also say we must be able to demonstrate that we have maintained our product storage spaces such that the required storage conditions for our products have been met.

To meet these requirements for temperature or humidity, the common industry practice is to perform a mapping validation, usually in conjunction with an installation qualification and operational qualification of the equipment involved (e.g., incubator, refrigerator, freezer, stability chamber, cold room, or warehouse).

Many validation contractors have the equipment and expertise to perform a mapping validation at a competitive cost. If you don’t have validation expertise in house, contracting might be a smart choice for your company. However, mapping validations are among the simplest of validation exercises, and therefore represent a fairly simple task to bring in-house as you build validation competency within your organization. Some contractors will happily prepare the protocol for you and rent the equipment so that you can learn this skill one step at a time.

Most people who contemplate doing a mapping validation for the first time look for answers to the same questions, such as:
• What limits should I use as an acceptable range for my study?
• What type of sensor(s) should I use?
• How many sensors do I need, and where should I place them?
• What should I do about calibrating my sensors?
• What is the appropriate duration for a mapping study?

Here are some quick answers to these questions to help you decide if you would like to try a mapping exercise.

What limits should I use as an acceptable range for my study?
This depends on what you are storing. You should be able to use the results of your stability studies, or the recommended storage conditions from the manufacturer of the product you are storing. You can use tighter limits if you wish, but it will be hard to justify using limits that are wider.

What kind of sensors should I use?
Your sensors should measure the attribute of concern—e.g., temperature and humidity. They should be accurate: An error of ±0.2°C is good for temperature, and ±3 percent is good for relative humidity. You can use thermocouples or data loggers, available from a wide variety of suppliers. If you use devices that require software to collect and download the data, or to generate reports, you will need to show that the software has been validated and is compliant to 21 CFR Part 11. Buy, rent, or borrow what you need.

How many sensors do I need?
The International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE) provided an answer in its document, “ISPE Good Practice Guide: Cold Chain Management” published May 2011, which is based on the French standard NFX 15 140: 2002—“Measurement of air moisture—Climatic and thermostatic chambers—Characterization and verification.” For spaces less than 2 m3 in volume, nine sensors are recommended. These would be placed in each corner, with one in the geometric center of the space. This would be a good configuration for most refrigerators, freezers, and incubators. For spaces between 2 m3 and 20 m3 in volume, 15 sensors are recommended. The configuration is the same as the nine sensor configuration, but the six additional sensors are placed in the geometric center of the plane of each wall, ceiling, and floor. All sensors, other than the one in the center, should be placed away from the nearest wall at a distance of 1/10 the length of the nearest side of the chamber. I recommend placing an additional sensor adjacent to the display, control, and monitoring probe(s), if applicable. And always, if you have more sensors, you might as well use them. However, be careful about collecting too much data; that creates extra work and sets a precedent for future studies.

If you are mapping spaces with volumes larger than 20 m3, there is no easy guideline. You must assess the space and determine likely sources of variation in temperature and humidity, such as HVAC systems, doors, and windows. Include these observations in your rationale so that the reviewers of the test documents can understand and evaluate your choices. A great approach to these larger spaces is to limit the sensor placement to only the spaces where product is actually stored, such as the racks and shelves. This can save on the number of sensors required and greatly simplify the process of determining sensor placement. However, if you map only the racks and shelves, the area will require procedural controls to ensure that product is stored only in the areas that were mapped.

What should I do about calibrating my sensors?
Sensors must be shown to be in calibration prior to and following the study. If you have calibration capabilities at your facility, you can do the calibration in-house. NIST traceable calibrations are expected. If you have purchased or rented sensors, you can likely depend on the vendor to supply calibration services.

What is the appropriate duration for a mapping study?
Your mapping study should be long enough to provide confidence that you have accurately captured the environmental dynamics of the space being mapped. Forty-eight hours is sufficient for most small spaces under 2 m3. This is assuming the space is not actively in use. The larger the space, and the more actively it is used during the study, the longer the expected duration of mapping. For a warehouse in use five days a week, a study duration of one week may be appropriate. You might want to consider seasonal changes as well for these spaces, performing your mapping studies twice—once each during the hottest and coldest times of the year.

For all of these questions, it’s important that you develop a clear rationale for your choices and document them in your validation protocol. Your rationale should be scientifically based, appropriate to your facility and product, and suitable for the intended use of the space being mapped.


About The Author

Paul Daniel’s picture

Paul Daniel

Paul Daniel, a senior regulatory compliance expert at Vaisala, has 15 years of validation experience in the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, and has worked on a wide range of qualification projects, including process, cleaning, shipping, laboratory equipment, packaging, software, network, and computer validation, and extensive practical grounding in applying the good manufacturing practices principles of the FDA 21 CFR Parts 11, 210, 211, and 820, and authoring and executing validation protocols for pharmaceutical manufacturing and software validation with a risk-based approach drawn from GAMP guidelines. Daniel has a bachelor’s degree in biology (with honors) from the University of California, Berkeley.