PROMISE: Our kitties will never sit on top of content. Please turn off your ad blocker for our site.
puuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrr
Dawn Bailey
Published: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 - 17:11 I heard the example that best helped me understand work systems and supply chains at a Baldrige training event right after the very sad 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan. A colleague was talking about automakers in the United States and elsewhere whose suppliers were located in the devastated region. Suddenly, manufacturers that I didn’t even realize had Japanese connections were faced with unexpected supply-chain disruptions. Such disruptions became critical because work systems—including, among other things, the external resources needed to develop and produce products—often depend on suppliers. “Located in the disaster region and adversely affected by these forces are a number of manufacturing facilities which are integral to the global motor vehicle supply chain,” noted the Congressional Research Service in its report, “The Motor Vehicle Supply Chain: Effects of the Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami.” “They include plants that assemble automobiles and many suppliers which build parts and components for vehicles. Some of the Japanese factories that were forced to close provide parts and chemicals not easily available elsewhere. This is particularly true of automotive electronics, a major producer of which was located near the center of the destruction.” The National Climatic Data Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a report that the United States experienced $8 billion worth of damage from in disasters in 2014. This included eight weather and climate disasters (including droughts, floods, severe storms, and winter storms), with losses exceeding $1 billion each across the United States. Overall, these events resulted in the deaths of 53 people and had significant economic effects on the areas impacted. With such examples and data, many organizations turn to the Baldrige Excellence Framework for guidance on what to take into consideration when contemplating work system decisions, supply-chain management, and safety and emergency preparedness. For example, does your disaster and emergency preparedness system take your reliance on suppliers into account (see Baldrige Criteria, 6.2c)? And how do you consider work system decisions, including decisions on when to use external suppliers of products and services, in your strategy (see Baldrige Criteria, 2.1a)? How do you know if your operations and work systems are safe from disasters? First published Oct. 27, 2015, on the Blogrige. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Dawn Bailey is a writer/editor for the Baldrige Program involved in all aspects of communications, from leading the Baldrige Executive Fellows program to managing the direction of case studies, social media efforts, and assessment teams. She has more than 25 years of experience (18 years at the Baldrige Program) working on publications and education teams. Her background is in English and journalism, with degrees from the University of Connecticut and an advanced degree from George Mason University.Work Systems and Supply Chains: Are You Ready in Case of Disaster?
The Baldrige Excellence Framework can help
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Dawn Bailey
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.
Comments
NA Localization
Dawn,
My name is Ken, I work at a Japanese automotive supplier.
I got hired for loccalization purposes in 2013. I PPAP local suppliers to reduce the dependency on international supply chains.
It's hard to balance quality and delivery needs for suppliers abroad. The boats that bring material over automatically put 2 months of invetory between anything in Asia and North America. Quality problems in 1 lot could continue for those 2 months. I had a supplier that had one problem that we had to sort for 3 individual times over 6 months because of the supply chain.
I've seen a relation between volume, cost, and quality for a local North America supply chain deliberation. Volumes for option parts on cars normally don't meet the requirements for localization unless they are very expensive per piece, probably above 50 dollars per part for the car maker. Quality decisions will trump cost decisions also, very specialized or proprietary methods used on some parts normally remain at one location until technology develops enough to permit localization.
I enjoy what I do, but it is a complicated dance between those three variables. Especially volume of option parts, for 3 months you could be working night and day on a project, and then the option volume drops and you wait for the next model year to begin working again.
Cheers, this article really resonated with me.