Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Operations Features
Steven Ouellette
How to create integrated metrics and a realistic strategic plan across a business
Philippe Aghion
Delegating power improves sales and productivity, boosting a firm’s chance of survival
Corey Brown
Protecting your most valuable assets
Chris Fox
Rediscovering the mother of all innovation—necessity
Drew Calvert
Should firms be required to disclose the negative social impacts of their suppliers?

More Features

Operations News
Provides improved thermal stability for stored materials, risk mitigation advantages, and processes that are documented and repeatable
This book is a tool for improvement and benchmarking
Automated system processes castable metallographic samples for specialty material manufacturers
Real-time data collection and custom solutions for any size shop, machine type, or brand
How to develop an effective strategic plan and make the best major decisions in the context of uncertainty and ambiguity
What continual improvement, change, and innovation are, and how they apply to performance improvement
Incorporates additional functionality and continuing improvements to the product’s existing rich features
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth
Make it simple and direct

More News

Jennifer V. Miller


How to Avoid Getting Sucked Into Needless Activity

Inclusiveness + Compulsion to act = Making things more complicated

Published: Thursday, September 17, 2020 - 11:02

There’s no shortage of important work to do—both at home and in your job. So, the last thing you want tossed your way is unnecessary work. Nobody likes needless activity, right?

But this is easier said than avoided. I’m sure you can easily recall getting pulled into something that did not add value—at least not in your opinion.

From a workplace perspective, here’s where I think part of the problem lies.

The past couple of decades have seen the rise of “The Group” e.g., self-directed work teams, participative decision-making. These work formations and processes definitely have many benefits; they also have drawbacks. In my observation, one unfortunate byproduct of group interaction is that needless activity gets added in the name of innovation and collaboration.

Add to that dynamic Americans’ love affair with taking action, and you have a recipe for nonvalue-added work.

The “people equation” looks like this:

Inclusiveness + Compulsion to act = Making things more complicated

For example, consider the story of Clarice and Sebastian, two department leaders at a large multinational corporation. Once a month, Clarice and Sebastian participate in a 15-person global conference call for their division. As Clarice gives her update, Sebastian offers a suggestion.

Sebastian: “Clarice, regarding [topic she is discussing], have you ever considered doing XYZ? If you did this, then you could... [Sebastian goes on to describe the process he would use to resolve the issue Clarice is reporting on.]

There are a few possible responses that Clarice might offer in reply to Sebastian.

A. “Sebastian, that’s a very interesting idea; let’s schedule a time offline to discuss it further.”

B. “Sebastian, I hear what you’re saying. Here’s the reason why we’re not moving in that direction....”

C. “Thanks for your feedback, Sebastian.”

Response A is very inclusive and action-oriented. It’s a valid response if Sebastian has offered a workable solution. But what if his solution doesn’t hold water? Then, Clarice could offer up response B. However, she may hesitate to do so in a large group conference call because her company stresses “thinking outside the box” and “inclusion.” Response B might be seen as shutting down innovation and collaboration, even if the solution offered is not feasible.

And what about response C?

This response requires no action from Clarice other than a polite acknowledgement of Sebastian’s comment. This response is a wise one if Clarice already knows for a fact that the solution being suggested has been tried, or absolutely won’t work.

When determining how to respond to a comment that potentially adds work to your team’s plate, ask yourself this question: Is the person making a direct request or a suggestion?

A suggestion sounds like: “Clarice, have you ever considered doing XYZ?”

A direct request is: “Clarice, can we meet to discuss how your team could improve the ABC process?”

In the phone conference example above, Sebastian was offering a suggestion. Because his comment didn’t explicitly state a call to action on Clarice’s part, she has the option of simply saying thank you and moving on. To do so requires discipline, especially if the corporate culture encourages “collaboration.”

Well-meaning colleagues are full of great ideas that will ostensibly help you do your job better. Making the distinction between a direct request and a suggestion can help you avoid getting pulled down the rabbit hole of wasted activity. It’s not a responsibility-shirking move, but rather an astute practice to help keep your team focused on their goals.

You may also enjoy: “Use This Conversational Tool to Avoid Getting Swamped.”


About The Author

Jennifer V. Miller’s picture

Jennifer V. Miller

Jennifer V. Miller is a leadership development consultant whose writing and digital training materials educates workplace professionals on how to lead with character, influence with integrity, and win with positive office politics.  Miller is the founder and managing partner of SkillSource, a consulting firm that helps organizations develop their leadership, sales, and team talent through the use of research-based assessments and learning materials. For nearly 25 years, Miller designed, delivered, and assessed hundreds of training workshops on leadership, management, communications, and interpersonal skills. Miller is the co-author of The Character-Based Leader (Dog Ear Publishing, 2012).