Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
Matthew Martin
Traditional CMMs are being challenged by fast-emerging, highly advanced blue-light scanning
Dean Solberg
If you can think about it and model it, you can 3D-print it
Gary Confalone

More Features

Metrology News
Four times faster data acquisition, enabling precise measurement at the submicron level
Caters to the growing need for sophisticated scanning in an entry-level solution that is budget friendly
Topics for the Go Forth and Measure project are virtually unlimited
Ask questions, exchange ideas and best practices, share product tips, discuss challenges in quality improvement initiatives

More News

Bert Coursey

Metrology

Saving Marie Curie’s Last Radium Standard

The famous chemist and NIST shared technical know-how during her U.S. visit in 1921

Published: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 11:01

Marie Curie is perhaps the most famous woman of 20th-century science. Major films and best-selling biographies have chronicled her discovery of the radioactive elements polonium and radium, for which she shared the Nobel Prize in physics in 1903 and then received a second Nobel Prize, this time in chemistry, in 1911. Very little note, however, has been made of her leadership role in developing radioactivity standards.

In 1910, she was asked by her peers to prepare the world’s first radium standard: a glass ampoule containing 21.99 milligrams of radium chloride, whose mass and radioactivity had been carefully measured. She agreed, on the advice of Nobel laureate Ernest Rutherford, that this international standard would not be kept in her Paris laboratory, but would instead be stored at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures in Sèvres in the Paris suburbs.

Because scientists urgently needed such standards to support their studies of radioactivity, the Czech/Austrian chemist Otto Hönigschmid was asked to prepare a set of seven secondary standards. Marie Curie calibrated these secondary standards against her primary standard. In December 1913, Secondary Standard No. 6, containing 20.28 milligrams of radium chloride, was delivered to the National Bureau of Standards, now known as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).


The enclosure where the Curie radium standards are kept. Credit: J. Stoughton/NIST

None of NIST’s recorded histories mentions Marie Curie, which I find a strange oversight. I came to NIST in 1972 and worked for 15 years in the Radioactivity Group, which maintains the national standards for radioactivity, including the standard for radium, in solutions. In 1988, I took over the Dosimetry Group, which maintains national standards for radiation doses from sources including radium. Searching through my new laboratories, I found a framed 1921 photograph of Marie Curie from The Pittsburgh Sun on top of an old file cabinet and started to wonder: What was her connection to NIST, and why did my predecessors save this photograph?


Marie Curie, c. 1920, Credit: Christie’s

Nearly 30 years later, I finally have some idea of how Marie Curie worked with our scientists as part of her leadership role in international radiation measurements and standards. And not a moment too soon! Essentially all of the radioactivity standards that she calibrated, including that first international (Paris) standard, have been disposed of as radioactive waste. However, Secondary Standard No. 6, which was made for the United States, is safely stored in a lead enclosure on our Gaithersburg, Maryland, campus along with two other international radium standards that we received in 1937. The certificates for these later sources were signed by Curie’s daughter, Irène Joliot-Curie, who took her mother’s place on the International Radium Standards Commission.

In 2015, NIST made a decision to dispose of these three standards as hazardous radioactive waste.

As I reflect on the situation, a few questions still linger in my mind. First, what importance did Marie Curie place on this one standard in the United States? Would she be amused or dismayed that this was the last Curie standard in existence? Also, what value do the three “Curie standards” in NIST’s possession have that would preclude their destruction?


The Curie radium standards inside copper
canisters. Credit: J. Stoughton/NIST

Marie Curie first visited the United States in May 1921 on a mission to collect a gram of radium that had been donated to her by the women of the United States. She and her two daughters made a whirlwind tour of cities on the East Coast as she collected honorary degrees from several universities. During her visit to Washington, D.C., she met with President Warren Harding at the White House and received a certificate for the gram of radium and a ceremonial box for the radium.

But the radium itself was contained in ten 100-milligram ampoules that had been prepared in Pittsburgh by the Standard Chemical Co. and were, at the time of her visit, at NIST being calibrated by comparison with Secondary Standard No. 6.

The organizing committee for her visit to Washington included Professor Samuel Wesley Stratton, NIST’s first director. On at least one morning during Curie’s days in Washington, Stratton hosted her at our original campus on Connecticut Avenue, where she examined the radium ampoules and discussed NIST’s gold-leaf electroscope measurement of the radium to assure herself that she was getting a full gram of the precious element. Her meetings with Stratton, and the follow-on visit she had with the chemists who separated the radium in Pittsburgh, were certainly the technical highlights of her visit to the United States.


The certificate for Secondary Standard No. 6

As to the fate of these last “Curie standards,” my NIST colleague Ronald Collé and I published an article in the Bulletin of the International Radiation Physics Society last fall in which we asked the international scientific community to offer reasons why these sources should not be destroyed. If these artifacts were normal objects, like the platinum-iridium kilograms from a century ago, it would be no problem to display them. But their hazardous nature dictates that they be handled with great care and stored in lead enclosures, making casual viewing significantly more complicated.

Frankly, I don’t know the answer. These standards are certainly important to the history of science, and I would like to see them preserved for posterity. We are looking forward to getting ideas from our colleagues on how we might save the last of the Curie standards from being swept into the dustbin of history.

First published Feb. 22, 2017, on the Taking Measure blog.

Discuss

About The Author

Bert Coursey’s picture

Bert Coursey

Bert Coursey is currently a guest researcher in the Standards Service Group at NIST. He received a Ph.D. in physical chemistry from the University of Georgia and came to the NIST Radioactivity Group in 1972. He has spent 45 years at NIST—with nine of these on detail to the Dept. of Homeland Security. He pursues outside interests including jogging, kayaking and beach walking with family in the South Carolina Lowcountry.