Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
Anna Akins
Robots could handle the human-based tasks of thinning and pruning peach trees
Rebecca Jacobson
A ruler for light, the frequency comb has ushered in medicine, electronics, and astrophysics
UC Berkeley NewsCenter
Important confirmation that scale-up will work
Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence
Open software platform enables nonspecialists to code and control any industrial robot to democratize industrial automation
Emily Newton
Consumers want to know that EVs are safe and reliable

More Features

Metrology News
Designed to reduce complexity and increase flexibility in design workflow
Quickly add magnetic chuck, precision vise, and other accessories knowing that each will be perfectly fit and aligned
HP-L-10.10 noncontact laser line scanner takes on broadest scope of CMM inspection tasks with speed, accuracy, flexibility
Award is for development of high-resolution SWIR electro-optical seeker
Partnership embeds quality assurance at every stage of the product life cycle, enables agile product introduction
A total of 152 Go and No-Go ring gages
Even cheaper, faster, more convenient: IDS presents solutions for the most diverse requirements
New design offers low-noise measurements on up to three orthogonal axes
Update offers primary support of QIF 3.0 with bi-directional translation and validation of the MBD portion

More News

William Tandler


Establishing Datum Reference Frames

Smart GD&T workshop No. 6

Published: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 - 22:00

What’s a datum reference frame?
As discussed in workshop No. 5, datum reference frames (DRF) are coordinate systems, and preferably—at least to start with—Cartesian coordinate systems.

As we know, coordinate systems serve to orient and locate objects, and in the world of GD&T in particular, to orient and locate tolerance zones.

Focusing on the encircled feature control frame in figure 1, below, it’s common to think of the cylindrical tolerance zone defined by the position tool as being oriented and located relative to datums A, B, and C. That’s sort of right, but in fact, datums A, B, and C don’t act directly, and instead serve to establish a DRF ABC, which in turn serves to orient and locate the tolerance zone. Our purpose in this workshop is to present the orderly process for establishing DRFs.

Figure 1. The part drawing

This process, not described in the Y14.5M 1994 standard, is presented in some detail in §4.7, pp. 18-20 in the Y14.5.1M 1994 standard. SmartGD&T breaks it down into six easy steps, which are based on two sets of rules. The six steps and the most important (but not all) associated rules are listed below:

Datum Reference Frame
Establishment Process Steps

  1. Decode the feature control frame
  2. Identify the datum features.
  3. Construct the datum feature simulators.
  4. Extract the datums from the simulators.
  5. Use the datums to constrain a starter coordinate system in the simulators, thereby turning it into the sought after datum reference frame.
  6. Marry the datum features to their simulators to transfer the DRF to the actual part.

Rules of
Datum Feature Simulator Management

  1. Rule of form control: All datum feature simulators shall have “perfect” form.

  1. Rule of size control: Datum feature simulators referenced RFS shall expand or contract to consume all the space available in or outside the associated datum feature. datum feature simulators referenced at MMC or LMC shall be fixed in size at the virtual maximum or virtual least material boundary of the associated datum feature.

  1. Rule of orientation control: All datum feature simulators shall be “perfectly” oriented by the basic angles of their associated datum features.

  1. Rule of location control: Barring instructions to the contrary, all datum feature simulators shall be fixed at the basic location of their associated datum features.

Rules of
Natural DRF Establishment

  1. Rule of datum feature precedence: All datum features (datum feature simulator, datum) shall be used in the order in which they appear in the feature control frame, reading from left to right.

  1. Rule of degrees of freedom precedence: Each datum feature (datum feature simulator, datum) shall first attempt to constrain pitch and yaw, then only roll, and only then translational degrees of freedom.

  1. Rule of non-override: No datum feature (datum feature simulator, datum) shall influence degrees of freedom already constrained by higher precedence datum features.

  2. The “can-may-must” rule: If a datum feature (datum feature simulator, datum) can constrain a degree of freedom, and it may, then it must.

These rules and processes are part of our attempt to simplify and systematize GD&T to the point at which it can be encoded and decoded, rather than used to decorate drawings for later interpretation. Some of these rules and processes are explicit in the Y14.5 and Y14.5.1 standards; some are implicit, and some are missing. But in the end, every rule and every step is essential, and all are based on fundamental reality. In particular, the processes outlined above fully duplicate those performed millions of times a day in machine and inspection shops all over the world, in which datum features are turned into manufacturing fixtures (datum feature simulators), whose coordinate systems are then made to coincide with those in machine tools, and then transferred to actual parts by mounting them in the fixtures.

Making it happen

With this introduction, we’re ready to proceed with the process.

Step 1. Decoding the feature control frame

Position requires the bounded axis of the considered feature to lie within a cylindrical tolerance zone of diameter 0.5 mm at maximum material condition, expanding, which is oriented and located by basic dimensions relative to a datum reference frame established using datum feature A simulated rocking, datum feature B simulated stably regardless of its size, and datum feature C simulated mobly at its virtual maximum material boundary.

Aware of the requirements, we’re now ready to proceed to Step 2, where we identify the datum features so that we can create their inverses, namely the dimulators we’ll need in Step 3.

Step 2. Identifying the datum features

Datum feature A is a planar surface. Datum feature B is a bore. Datum feature C is a slot.

Step 3.  Constructing the simulators
As shown in figure 2 below, the simulator for A is a “perfectly’ flat planar surface pointing in the opposite direction. The simulator for “B” is an expanding cylinder (expanding because the tolerance zone size modifier (S) requires it to consume all the available space). Finally, the simulator for C is a tombstone fixed in thickness at the width of the material-free zone inside the slot, namely at the width of its virtual maximum material boundary, equal to the minimum slot width of 16.5 mm, minus the width of the position tolerance zone of 0.5 mm, for a total of 16 mm.

Figure 2. The datum feature simulator set

Step 4. Extracting the datums from the simulators

Based on the definition of datums presented in Workshop No. 5, datum A is the tangent plane on datum feature simulator A, datum B is the axis of datum feature simulator B, and datum C is the midplane of datum feature simulator C, as illustrated in figure 3.

Figure 3. The datums and their associated datum feature simulators

Step 5. Using the datums to constrain a starter coordinate system in the simulators, thereby turning it into the sought after datum reference frame

In this process, datum A will constrain the pitching and yawing, as well as the translation in Z of the starter coordinate system, datum B will constrain two more degrees of translational freedom, bringing the Z axis in line with the axis of B, and datum C will constrain roll, the last degree of freedom, producing the DRF lodged in the simulators illustrated in figure 4.

Figure 4. The datum reference frame established in the simulators

Step 6. Marrying the datum features to their simulators to transfer the datum reference frame to the actual part

Marrying datum feature A to its simulator constrains pitch and yaw as well as translation in Z, but with some potential residual mobility. This is due to the Y14.5M 1994 rule of rocking datum feature simulation in combination with the possibility that datum feature A is somewhat convex. Marrying datum feature B to its initially unexpanded simulator, and then expanding the simulator to achieve stability, constrains translation in X and Y. Finally, marrying datum feature C to its tombstone simulator constrains roll, but only partially, depending on the extent to which datum feature C departs from its virtual maximum material boundary. The end result is illustrated in figure 5.

Figure 5. Transferring the datum reference frame from the simulators to the part

Because the whole purpose of establishing a datum reference frame is to constrain a tolerance zone, we now see that the cylindrical tolerance zone defined by the position tool is constrained in location, but is still free to pitch and yaw slightly relative to A, and roll slightly relative to C.

As described above, all this mirrors the process of building a manufacturing fixture, inserting it into a machine tool, and ultimately mounting a part in the fixture to cause its coordinate system to coincide with that in the machine. It also mirrors the process which coordinate measuring machine software is supposed to, and hopefully follows.

In retrospect, we now understand for the first time the intimate connections between machine parts and people, namely, that whether we’re marrying machine parts to their simulators or guys to their gals, the process is the orderly (well, most of the time) and sequential reduction in the degrees of freedom between the partners.

Future articles
Our next SmartGD&T workshop will demonstrate the encoding process, the process of researching the function of a part and of its individual features, and then encoding those functions for later analysis in design, and, finally, for transfer to the machine shop and quality assurance. Subsequent articles will be dedicated to converting the code into a manufacturing process, and then into an inspection process.

Feedback on topics of interest
We got a couple of e-mail inputs in response to our last article, for which we were very grateful. Thank you Eddy Ang and Tim Schroeder. We really appreciate questions, so we can be sure we are addressing problems of interest.

About the author
William Tandler is the founder of Multi Metrics, a provider of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing technology and corporate implementation services. Through its SmartGD&T technology, training, and consulting products and services, Multi Metrics enables companies and individuals to realize the promise of GD&T.


About The Author

William Tandler’s picture

William Tandler

William Tandler’s professional experience includes three years at the Hewlett Packard R&D laboratory in Palo Alto, CA, where he helped develop a quadruple mass spectrometer; five years with the laser manufacturer Coherent Inc. as international marketing manager; followed in 1975 by the founding of Multi Metrics Inc.

Tandler is currently a member of the ASME Y14.5.1 Mathematization Committee; a subject matter expert for Working Group 4 of the ASME Y14.5 standard focused on datums; and has been a contributor to ISO TC213 in the realm of datum reference frame construction.