Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
Marlon Walker
Collaborative robots are already working in close proximity with humans on the shop floor
MIT News
System uses RFID tags to home in on targets; could benefit robotic manufacturing, collaborative drones
Tamper-proof data transmission, traceability of data to all participants in the production process
David L. Chandler
New system of ‘strain engineering’ can change a material’s optical, electrical, and thermal properties

More Features

Metrology News
Diamond styli are an excellent choice for demanding applications
Two key configurations: UH4250 Hardness Scale 0.5-250 kgf and UH4750 Hardness Scale 3-750 kgf
Detects challenging targets with a range up to 2 meters
Control machine performance by detecting manufacturing faults as well as part or tool variations
Low power consumption, solid performance for wide range of applications
New S1 systems offer high volume production testing of compression and extension springs
S-T optical equipment owners encouraged to register their equipment with Dorsey Metrology
They’re spring-loaded AC LVDTs ideal for roundness measurements, automotive testing and materials testing
Works with Marposs LVDT/HVT manual gauges

More News

Jennifer Lauren Lee


Expanding the Repertoire of NIST’s World-Class Coordinate Measuring Machines

‘Bob’ takes on ultra-high precision measurements for industry

Published: Thursday, February 22, 2018 - 13:01

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is home to one of the most sensitive machines in the world for measuring objects’ dimensions. Customers who rely on the instrument include the military, academia, instrument manufacturers, private industry calibration labs, and more.

Recently, NIST staff added a second machine with comparable sensitivities. Thanks in part to the new addition—nicknamed “Bob”—NIST is now able to take on more specialty measurements for industry. Staff are currently working on a request from a manufacturer to measure the dimensions of high-precision custom parts, a departure from the usual high-precision standardized objects they measure.

ring gauges
A set of ring-shaped gauges sitting on one of NIST’s coordinate measuring machines (CMMs). The ruby-tipped shaft (center) is the touch probe.

“It’s not typical that parts are manufactured to tolerances where measuring them directly with NIST’s equipment makes sense,” says NIST’s John Stoup. “But these are really high-precision parts, and they need this level of accuracy in order to function properly.”

Though it is not the first time NIST has measured a precision part for a customer, the work positions NIST to fulfill other requests from industry for specialty part measurements, which Stoup believes will become more common as manufacturers require tighter and tighter tolerances.

To ensure their products meet specifications, manufacturers often measure their parts with a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). These instruments measure the size, shape, and location of key features on the surface of parts placed on the CMM’s table.

But manufacturers must also make sure that their CMMs themselves are calibrated correctly. To do this, they rely on a class of objects called standard reference gauges, which are precisely machined metal shapes like bars, cylinders, and spheres with nearly perfect form.

NIST’s most sensitive CMMs—“Bob” and its older counterpart, which has the more homely name “Primary M48”—are used to measure customer’s gauges. These two CMMs, each the size of a car, use a touch probe to detect, and integrated laser interferometers to measure, the distances between points on an object with 10 billionths of a meter sensitivity.

Once the gauges are calibrated, NIST sends them back to the manufacturers, which then measure the gauges using their own machinery. If the company gets a similar result as NIST, then it can have high confidence that its own CMMs are working properly.

However, calibrated gauges look different from parts. And the greater those differences—in shape, material, and even surface finish—the higher the uncertainties on measurements made by the customer’s machine. By calibrating a master part instead of a gauge, Stoup says manufacturers can expect accuracies at least twice as high on their own in-house dimensional measurements of nominally identical parts.

Stoup admits that it takes creativity to use NIST’s CMMs to measure objects with nonstandard shapes. Unlike gauges, precision parts’ sides are not necessarily flat or square, and their features are usually not symmetrical. A measuring force applied to one area of the part will deform or bend the object differently from a force applied to a different location.

“It’s a really nice part, but it’s a terrible gauge,” Stoup says. “So that presents a unique challenge. How do you fixture something that’s not a standard shape so that it doesn’t move around when you touch it?” Stoup asked.

To address these problems, Stoup’s team makes the same series of measurements repeatedly, changing the strength of the touch probe’s force each time. NIST researchers expect the object to move slightly when the probe makes contact with its surface. But by varying the force, they can extrapolate how much the contact itself is influencing the measurements and zero out these effects. They also vary the size of the probe tip and the part’s orientation on the table for a better understanding of the interaction between the part’s surface and the measuring machine.

“Characterizing all of this behavior and accuracy on our instruments means less work for customers using these parts as future mastering artifacts for their own CMMs,” says Stoup. “These machines are great comparators, but to excel, they need an accurate master gauge. What could be a better master gauge than an actual precision part?”

Stoup believes that calibrating precision parts may become more common in the future, as manufacturers begin to need nanometer-level accuracy. And he’s hoping NIST’s work now will prepare them for the growing demand.

“The extra instrument, Bob, has given us the freedom to do some of this research: how to move into the field of precision parts rather than primarily high-quality gauges,” says Stoup. “And as the manufacturing tolerances continue to get tighter and tighter, and accuracy requirements get higher, I think we’re going to see more of this kind of request in the future.

“The fact that we’re doing this now means we’re perhaps a little ahead of the curve.”


About The Author

Jennifer Lauren Lee’s picture

Jennifer Lauren Lee

Jennifer Lauren Lee is a science communicator in the Washington, D.C. area with specialization in physics writing, web design, editing, and multimedia. She is a technical writer and editor at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) where she writes monthly articles on physics topics for NIST’s Physical Measurement Laboratory (PML), as well as records and edits videos demonstrating physics concepts and experimental setups used at PML to maintain and distribute national standards. Lee has master’s degrees in specialized journalism and science, and bachelor’s degrees in English and world literature.