Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
Prashant Kapadia
Aid root cause analysis by detecting wear and tear in advance
Mike John
How metrology can bring the medical-device design and manufacturing process together
Steven Brown
21st-century standard candles at NIST
It’s actually the differences in a twin that are most useful

More Features

Metrology News
Meet the latest generation of LC xx6 encoders
On-demand pipe flow measurement, no process interruptions
Q-Span Gauging Systems improve efficiency, capacity, and real-time reporting of quality departments
Products range from software to scanners
See MobileCollect in Action in Booth No. 135413
Four new models available in TVM Series

More News

Mark Albert


The Case For Integrated Control of Machining Operations

Published: Monday, March 30, 2009 - 13:00

Many shops have implemented computerized systems to gather data for production reporting, quality control, statistical process control (SPC), and tool management. Stephen Birman, president of High Tech Research Inc. of Deerfield, Illinois, believes one knowledge-based system that integrates all of these functions can create a level of operational control that delivers otherwise unattainable benefits. Not surprisingly, this holistic concept is behind the Micronite software that his company offers.

His definition of integration goes beyond simply getting separate shop control, inspection, and tool control systems to share data to help managers make better decisions and streamline operations. He contends that a complete “production loop” should intertwine automated downtime monitoring, shopfloor-based process control, error-proof quality assurance, and proactive operations management. This intelligent loop enables machinists to control machining output efficiently and effectively. Result-oriented interactive control, he says, prevents the production of out-of-tolerance parts, wasted tool life and unnecessary production stoppages. The net result is at least a 10-percent reduction in production costs, elimination of human errors, and increased throughput.

The key is using system-supervised data capture to determine the process profile for modeling tool wear and variation patterns, and then dynamically adjusting the frequency of part sampling. The Micronite system automates a decision-making process that helps a machinist inspect parts on a timely basis, offset or change tools, and appeal to engineers for improvement of process design. In essence, the software uses the data to create a knowledge base about each monitored operation and the performance of the related cutting tool. “The system turns the shop floor into a machining lab from which data can be analyzed and used as the ‘science’ behind decision making,” Birman says. Accuracy of process decisions and the appropriateness of corrective actions are further reinforced by using sampling results and the growing body of tooling information in the database. He calls this approach “adaptive tool life expectancy.”

In the Micronite system, different predictive models are applied to specific machining processes, equipment, materials, lot sizes, and so on. There are special models for small-batch production, super-precision components, hard-to-machine materials and multifunctional tools. For example, operations in which one cutting tool is associated with one workpiece dimension require a different control strategy than operations involving a cutting tool that creates multiple dimensions. These strategies are tailored for each situation so that data can be analyzed appropriately and behavior predicted accurately. As artificial intelligence in the software determines the nonlinear trends emerging in the data, it may change the frequency of part sampling. This allows the system to reliably detect when accelerated tool wear is beginning to occur. At this point, the system automatically tells the operator to stop the process. This happens before defective parts are made but not before the tool is truly approaching the end of its useful life.

Birman points out that an integrated operations control system belies some of the myths that plague other control philosophies. For example, many systems based solely on SPC assume that any machining process can be run under a state of statistical control. Unfortunately, he says, this assumption is contrary to the dynamics of most machining operations, which are nonlinear and nonrepetitive in nature. This precludes use of SPC either for machining process control or for assurance of precise component quality.

Furthermore, SPC advises that monitoring efforts should concentrate on control of the tightest tolerances. If these tolerances can be held, it is assumed, wider tolerance bands will also be under control. The flaw in this approach is that a tighter tolerance created by a multifunctional tool may be more stable than ones involving looser tolerances, Birman says. Thus, SPC techniques may not ensure that defective parts won’t be produced. The data gathering and intelligent analysis techniques in the Micronite system, however, treat each machining and grinding operation according to its own distinctive characteristics.

This article first appeared in the April 2009 issue of Modern Machine Shop.


About The Author

Mark Albert’s picture

Mark Albert

Mark Albert is editor in chief of Modern Machine Shop.