Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
Ryan E. Day
Realigning a cornerstone of industry
Willow Ascenzo
N-ray can provide a different, and often useful, perspective from planar X-ray radiography and CT
Donald J. Wheeler
Do your instruments have the same amount of measurement error?
Matthew Staymates
Visual proof supports the ‘Cover smart, do your part, slow the spread’ slogan
NIST
For more accurate time, navigation, communication, and higher-resolution imaging for radar and astronomy

More Features

Metrology News
Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence launches technologies to transform inspection workflows for enhanced productivity
An efficient and cost-saving way of working with materials like plastic, glass and ceramic
Detects and reports on tool breakage, missing tools, overload, tool wear and fluid flow in real time
Collects thousands of data samples within milliseconds
Automated system processes castable metallographic samples for specialty material manufacturers
3D scans help Chicago Jet Group retrofit old Dassault Falcon avionics system
Lloyd Instruments launches the LS5 high-speed universal testing machine
Measure diameter, ovality of wire samples, optical fibers and magnet wire, including transparent products

More News

Dustin Poppendieck

Metrology

Breathing Easier: Measuring Formaldehyde in Wood Construction Products

We need to ensure that the formaldehyde concentrations measured by manufacturers and labs are accurate

Published: Thursday, December 5, 2019 - 13:03

On August 29, 2005, I was starting my first semester teaching freshman environmental engineering majors at Humboldt State University in Arcata, California. At the exact same time, Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana and Mississippi with 190 kph (120 mph) winds and a storm surge in excess of 6 meters (20 feet). Levees failed, flooding more than 80 percent of New Orleans and many surrounding areas. This tragedy left more than 1,800 people dead, many of whom had been trapped in their own homes. It took nearly six weeks for the water to recede, exposing more than 130,000 destroyed housing units.

I spent the rest of the semester (and subsequent ones) discussing with my students the lessons that environmental engineers should learn from Katrina and its aftermath (levees, water treatment, mold, air testing, planning for disasters, and more). Little did I know I would still be dealing with some of the issues revealed by Hurricane Katrina nearly 15 years later as a scientist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

A tree stripped of bark at the 17th Street Canal levee breach in New Orleans.
A tree stripped of bark at the 17th Street Canal levee breach in New Orleans.
Credit: Dustin Poppendieck/NIST
an interior wall of a house covered in mold
Mold and property damage to a home in the Lakeview neighborhood in New Orleans.
Credit: Dustin Poppendieck/NIST

Together with my colleague Jennifer Woertz, I visited New Orleans four times during the 10 months following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall. We entered the city before residents were allowed back in. Seeing the scale of the damage firsthand in an eerie silence was shocking and apocalyptic. We visited 10 houses and a school to characterize the species of mold present and the airborne mold spore concentrations, and to measure the change in the moisture content of the wallboard and studs.

As people slowly began to return to the city, two major tasks faced every homeowner: removing the mold-contaminated material (which exposed numerous volunteers to elevated concentrations of mold spores) and finding a place to live.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) attempted to meet the second challenge by supplying more than 100,000 trailers. The number of existing trailers in the United States when Katrina hit was about 10 times fewer than was needed, so FEMA greatly expedited trailer delivery. Compared with the devastated homes Katrina left, the clean, new trailers were a relief. However, occupants soon began reporting nosebleeds, headaches, and breathing issues. Private and federal testing undertaken between 2006 and 2008 determined that wood products used in the trailers’ construction were emitting formaldehyde (a known carcinogen) at a high rate, resulting in concentrations that were five to 40 times that found in the average home.

two trailer homes parked on the front lawns of houses damaged by Hurricane Katrina. mobile trailer parked on the front lawn of a house damaged by Hurricane Katrina

Temporary housing trailers in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Credit: Dustin Poppendieck

But this was not the first or last time formaldehyde emissions from wood products were in the news. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) declared in 1992 that there was no safe level of formaldehyde exposure. Wood products such as hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard were targets for regulation, given the large volume sold and the use of formaldehyde-based resins to hold the wood components together. While the Katrina trailers were being tested for formaldehyde, CARB passed (in 2007) the Composite Wood Products Airborne Toxic Control Measure, which limited the emissions of formaldehyde from wood products that were sold or manufactured in California. Fully implemented in 2012, the measure instituted mandatory emission testing for wood products along with a third-party certification program. The federal Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act of 2010 was modeled on the California measure, and the EPA rule to comply with the act was fully implemented on March 22, 2019. For compliance testing in both cases, the wood products are placed in a chamber flushed with clean air. Once stable, formaldehyde concentrations are then compared to the values allowed by regulations. Products not meeting these values cannot be sold.

A woman in a lab coat (left) watches as a man in a lab coat (right) gestures at a small device he is holding in his hand.
My colleague Mengyan Gong and I with our formaldehyde emitter SRM. Credit: Mark Esser/NIST

Just like we want to make sure the gallon (3.8 liters) of gasoline we are buying is actually a gallon of gasoline, there is a need to ensure that the formaldehyde concentrations measured by the wood product manufacturers and third-party labs are accurate. There are many variables that affect formaldehyde measurements: temperature, relative humidity, air flow and mixing, and the measurement technique. My goal, along with my NIST colleague Mengyan Gong, is to create a reusable source that releases formaldehyde into the chamber in a controlled way and can be used with the testing techniques required by CARB and EPA statutes. This will allow testing labs to certify results faster without requiring time-consuming studies comparing the results achieved by multiple laboratories.

Components of NIST prototype formaldehyde emission reference material. Two white cylinders, two steel endcaps, screws, washers, and membranes
The components of the NIST prototype formaldehyde emission reference material. Credit: Dan Greb/NIST

Currently, our prototype reference material consists of a bottle made of stainless steel and a material commonly used as a nonstick coating. The bottle is filled with a solution of formaldehyde in water. Release of formaldehyde from the bottle is limited by a replaceable thin membrane in the cap. The membrane is currently being produced by our colleagues Christopher Stafford and Marcos Reyes-Martinez.

We hope that after further testing, we can produce a reference material that will give consumers confidence that the wood products, cabinets, and flooring they buy at their local home improvement store will not emit significant amounts of formaldehyde.

As bad as Hurricane Katrina was, it did teach us a lot about our response to and recovery from storms, and brought many important issues to light. I’m glad that work done by my colleagues and I might help people breathe a little easier in the future.

Discuss

About The Author

Dustin Poppendieck’s picture

Dustin Poppendieck

Dustin Poppendieck got his Ph.D. in environmental engineering in 2002 from the University of Texas at Austin. His current efforts are focused on quantifying emissions into indoor air from household products and building materials. In his free time, he likes to play ultimate frisbee, run, canoe and do home improvement projects with his family.

Comments

Formaldehyde in Wood Products

Glad to hear you are working on this.  In the 70's, while working for Georgia-Pacific, I became aware of a health issue in Russian school children caused by formaldehyde release from wooden school furniture.  We discovered this by technical literature searches which were at that time in their infancy.  Our search system used a program developed by the Systems Development Corporation and included outside literature as well as company technical reports which we keyword coded and sent to SDC.  As far as we know, this was the first private computer searchable database in the USA.  Deanna Morrow and I published a paper on our work in TAPPI in 1972.

As a producer of formaldehyde and its use in many products our company was alerted to potential problems.  I recall making a trip to the US Forest Products Laboratory in Madison WI to discuss the issue.  They had developed a test method using as I recall purpald to detect formaldehyde release and something of its concentration.

I know there has been much work since that time.  Thanks for the update.

William H. Pound, PhD, retired