Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
James Rawstron
Jet wing surface scan reduced to under four minutes
Michael Huda
How do you control a color that absorbs so much light, spectrophotometers can’t measure it?
Matthew Martin
Traditional CMMs are being challenged by fast-emerging, highly advanced blue-light scanning
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
Christmas is creeping, should a four-year degree really be the minimum requirement, and what we learn from Disneyland
Dean Solberg
If you can think about it and model it, you can 3D-print it

More Features

Metrology News
Four times faster data acquisition, enabling precise measurement at the submicron level
Caters to the growing need for sophisticated scanning in an entry-level solution that is budget friendly
Topics for the Go Forth and Measure project are virtually unlimited
Ask questions, exchange ideas and best practices, share product tips, discuss challenges in quality improvement initiatives

More News

NIST

Metrology

Fundamental Constants: The Latest—and the Last?

The more things change, the more some things have to stay the same

Published: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 - 10:37

In a world of incessant change, some things have to stay the same. One is the set of values for the fundamental physical constants—such as the speed of light or the charge of the electron—that underlie precision measurements in industry, science, and medicine worldwide.

Yet even the constants themselves occasionally change incrementally to reflect the latest experimental determinations. The values are determined and issued by the Task Group on Fundamental Constants of the International Council for Science’s Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA), of which the United States is one of 23 member nations. CODATA collects the best determinations from academic laboratories, independent standards laboratories, and national metrology institutes. By international agreement, a new set of official suggested values is published every four years, and NIST is now displaying the most recent (the 2014 values, published two months ago) on its website.

The quadrennial list rarely generates headlines, but the 2014 values are remarkable in the context of the planned redefinition of the International System of Units (SI) base units in 2018.

Several years ago, the international General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM)—the diplomatic body that has the authority under the Meter Convention to enact such a sweeping change—approved a plan to redefine four of the seven SI base units in terms of fixed values of fundamental constants. Specifically, the kilogram, kelvin, ampere, and mole will be redefined in terms of the Planck constant, the Boltzmann constant, the charge of the electron, and the Avogadro constant. Those values would be fixed at the most accurate values obtainable at the time of redefinition.

But CGPM placed strict preconditions and technical requirements for agreement and uncertainties in those measurements, and the 2010 values of two key constants did not meet those criteria. For example, CGPM had called for determinations of the Planck constant (h, used to redefine the kilogram) that had relative uncertainties of 20 parts per billion (ppb) and were consistent between two physically different methods of measurement. The 2010 value had a relative uncertainty of 43 ppb.

Thanks in large measure to painstaking efforts by scientists in NIST’s Physical Measurement Laboratory (PML) to investigate, re-analyze, and refit NIST’s workhorse watt balance, the latest values for h have a combined relative uncertainty of 12 parts ppb—a threefold improvement since the 2010 values—and are consistent among three different laboratories in three countries. The 2014 values also include a determination for the Boltzmann constant (used to define the kelvin) that substantially exceeds CGPM’s relative uncertainty criteria.

Other highlights of the 2014 values include a tenfold improvement in the uncertainty in the mass of the electron, and significant improvement in the magnetic moment of the proton.

“The 2014 CODATA recommended values of the constants reflect improvements in measurements that allow the redefinition of the SI anticipated for 2018 to be on track,” says Peter Mohr, manager of the Fundamental Constants Data Center in PML. “If things go as planned, this will be the last official set of fundamental constants based on the SI as it is now defined. After 2018 there will be new recommended values based on the new SI that will have significantly smaller uncertainties in most cases.”


Click on image for an abbreviated list of the CODATA recommended values of the fundamental constants of physics and chemistry.

Discuss

About The Author

NIST’s picture

NIST

Founded in 1901, The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a nonregulatory federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce. Headquartered in Gaithersburg, Maryland, NIST’s mission is to promote U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life.

Comments

Interesting and Nicely Written

The work to achieve such small uncertainties is remarkable and painstaking.  Equally remarkable is this nice summary.  Clear and concise - not easy to achieve with such a technical subject.  Best wishes for the redefinition.