Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
James Rawstron
Jet wing surface scan reduced to under four minutes
Michael Huda
How do you control a color that absorbs so much light, spectrophotometers can’t measure it?
Matthew Martin
Traditional CMMs are being challenged by fast-emerging, highly advanced blue-light scanning
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
Christmas is creeping, should a four-year degree really be the minimum requirement, and what we learn from Disneyland
Dean Solberg
If you can think about it and model it, you can 3D-print it

More Features

Metrology News
Four times faster data acquisition, enabling precise measurement at the submicron level
Caters to the growing need for sophisticated scanning in an entry-level solution that is budget friendly
Topics for the Go Forth and Measure project are virtually unlimited
Ask questions, exchange ideas and best practices, share product tips, discuss challenges in quality improvement initiatives

More News

NIST

Metrology

Precision Testing for MEMS Accelerometers

Standardized protocols for life’s ubiquitous sensors

Published: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 - 16:07

They activate airbags. Keep aircraft correctly positioned in flight. Detect earthquakes or sudden vibrations in failing machinery. Guide military hardware. Monitor falls in elderly individuals and initiate calls for help. They rotate the display on a smartphone from vertical to horizontal, and measure our exercise intensity and activity level in gadgets we carry or wear.

These and hundreds of similar tasks are performed around the world every day by accelerometers—sensors that respond to change in motion. They are fast becoming ubiquitous, and their components have shrunk to the micrometer scale. Increasingly, they measure acceleration along three orthogonal axes.

However, despite the growing importance of three-axis accelerometers, there are no standardized testing protocols for evaluating the performance of these microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).


Figure 1: The goniometer-based instrument. The pivot arm is shown with a three-axes accelerometer mounted. Credit: NIST/PML.

That’s why National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) scientists, in consultation with the MEMS and Sensors Industry Group (MSIG) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), are completing work on a new NIST test facility that can measure two properties of critical concern to industry: the responsivity of the units and the alignment of their three nominally orthogonal (mutually perpendicular) axes.

“MSIG worked with IEEE to develop standard definitions, published in 2014,” says Michael Gaitan of NIST’s Physical Measurement Laboratory (PML). “Now the next step is: How do we test and evaluate their performance? If we’re all measuring things in different ways, how do we know if we agree with each other? That’s what we’re leading here at NIST—going beyond the terminology standards, and adding the development of the testing protocols as well.”

Many companies (typically smaller or startup system integrators) buy device components from microfabricators, and are neither equipped nor inclined to deal with fine details of measurement or to determine uncertainties. Often the companies go to a third party to get specific answers.

“As a result, an ecosystem of test labs, component device fabricators, and accelerometer manufacturers is emerging,” Gaitan says. “That is an ideal opportunity for NIST to play a leading role, consistent with our efforts to provide standards and best practices that can enable everybody to measure the same properties in the same way.”

That is the goal of the new test facility and data analysis method, which are optimized for three-axes accelerometers. The facility is based on a goniometer, an instrument for the precision measurement of angles. A swivel arm moves the test accelerometer through an entire sphere of angular orientation with respect to the local gravitational field, and the system records data at intervals.

PML scientist Jon Geist devised a method of extracting both responsivity and axis-orthogonality error from the output data. When they began making preliminary measurements on a few commercial accelerometers, some of the results were very surprising.

“For example, we found a two-degree orthogonality error between two of the axes of one type of unit,” Geist says. “But it wasn’t where we expected it. These are planar devices, made in semiconductor fabrication facilities. So we assumed that we would see exact alignment on the [horizontal] x and y axes, and any misalignment on the z [vertical] axis. That’s because often the z-axis component is a different device mounted in the same package. Well, it turns out that the unit’s x-z and y-z alignments were extremely good, but its x-y alignment was not.

“So we’ve gone back to industry and said, ‘We’re creating this test facility, and we’re starting to look at sensors, and here are the results we’re getting,’” says Gaitan. “Now several manufacturers are working with us.” Device assembly and testing accounts for as much as 60 percent of the cost of manufacturing accelerometers. So as production volume increases, companies are anxious to identify accurate and fast ways of testing a small, representative sample of their production runs.

What the NIST researchers have found is that sampling and measuring only individual components may not identify all possible problems.

“Because these are MEMS devices, misalignments can occur in the course of assembly and the packaging process,” Gaitan says. “Once you take the component devices off the wafer and start assembly, the package itself can create mechanical stress, which can lead to misalignment. That introduces an additional complication to quality control testing.


Figure 2: Close-up of mounting site with accelerometer (small black rectangle on the red circuit board) ready for testing. Credit: NIST/PML. Click on image for photo of the NIST-designed apparatus that reads out data from the accelerometer.

“But just conducting calibrations on individual units and then sending them back to the customer doesn’t do anything to ensure industry uniformity,” says Gaitan. “And it doesn’t give us the feedback we need in order to give manufacturers what they need in the way they need it. So we’re trying to get everyone to come to an agreement on how we should do this. With IEEE, with which we are working closely on these standards, what we envision in the long term is that NIST would not only provide a calibration facility to conduct intercomparisons among testing labs, but NIST also might be part of a certification and accreditation program for test labs. That would entail developing standard testing protocols that could ensure uniformity in measurement. That’s a capability that industry will need as production expands.”

Karen Lightman, executive director of MSIG, explains that NIST is working with her organization “to develop standards for performance testing and communications protocols for MEMS and sensor technologies that are ubiquitously used in automobiles, healthcare/wellness products (such as wearables), and smartphones, as well as many other products important to the consumer. These standards reduce manufacturing costs and time-to-market to enable more efficient production of new technologies and applications that result in an annual production of more than 1.4 billion units and sales of $400 billion in the global market for the smartphone alone.”

The standards now under development will be critical going forward. “The work that NIST is doing with MSIG will have considerable impact on the future success of this industry as well as the ancillary markets, most notably enabling the true realization of an Internet of Things, which is and will be based on the connection of potentially trillions of MEMS and sensors,” notes Lightman.

Discuss

About The Author

NIST’s picture

NIST

Founded in 1901, The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a nonregulatory federal agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce. Headquartered in Gaithersburg, Maryland, NIST’s mission is to promote U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life.