That’s fake news. Real news COSTS. Please turn off your ad blocker for our web site.
Our PROMISE: Our ads will never cover up content.
Harish Jose
Published: Thursday, July 2, 2020 - 12:03 Shigeo Shingo is one of my heroes in industrial engineering. He had a great mind that thrived on curiosity. Today I am looking at Shingo’s Whys. This is in contrast to Taiichi Ohno’s 5 Whys method. Ohno’s 5 Whys method is one of the tools in Toyota Production System to get to the root cause of an issue. When you see a problem, you ask, “Why did that problem happen?” When you get an answer to that question, you then ask, “Why did that problem No. 2 happen?” and so on until you get to the root cause. When you eliminate the root cause, the problem is solved. This approach assumes a direct and linear cause-and-effect relationship. And depending on the user’s expertise and experience, you can get different results. A tool like 5 Whys is user-dependent and one-dimensional. It is appropriate for necessary causes; it may not be appropriate for sufficient causes. Its usefulness certainly diminishes as complexity increases. Shingo’s Whys are not in relation to Ohno’s 5 Whys, but another set of questions, known as 5W1H. They are: These questions are the levers you can push to further the search for answers. It is said that the origin of these questions goes back to the great Aristotle. Another source where the idea of the 5W1H was stated clearly is from Thomas Aquinas: “For in acts we must take note of who did it, by what aids or instruments he did it, what he did, where he did it, why he did it, how and when he did it.” The idea of 5W1H was also made famous by Rudyard Kipling: The usefulness of this simple framework is also illustrated in the Job Methods program from the Training Within Industry initiative: Shingo viewed these as the five elements of production. He noted them as: In a simple example of producing a medical swab, perhaps the five elements of production are: Shingo teaches us to ask “Why?” to each of the five elements of production (Shingo’s Whys): He brilliantly explained: “The five elements of production just make up the status quo. If we want to improve the present situation, we must direct the question ‘Why?’ at each one of those elements repeatedly and relentlessly.” The obvious question this would lead to is whether we can ask a “why” question to the “Why?” itself. I will leave this question for the reader to ponder. The questioning with “Why?” gets to the actual purpose behind the reasoning or rationale of a decision. It is an effective way to get to meta-analysis, a second-order activity. Shigeo Shingo learned the ideas of making improvements from another giant, Lillian Gilbreth. Shingo learned from Ken’ichi Horigome, who learned from Jiro Kakuda. Kakuda learned the concepts and techniques of improvement at Gilbreth’s institute in the United States. Shingo wonderfully summarized the Gilbreth approach as (the emphasis is mine): A keen student of the Toyota Production System can identify the inspirations of continuous improvement in the steps detailed above. I will finish with wonderful words of wisdom from Shingo, Stay safe and always keep on learning… First published June 7, 2020, on Harish’s Notebook blog. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Harish Jose has more than seven years experience in the medical device field. He is a graduate of the University of Missouri-Rolla, where he obtained a master’s degree in manufacturing engineering and published two articles. Harish is an ASQ member with multiple ASQ certifications, including Quality Engineer, Six Sigma Black Belt, and Reliability Engineer. He is a subject-matter expert in lean, data science, database programming, and industrial experiments, and publishes frequently on his blog Harish’s Notebook.Shingo’s Whys
The next logical step in complexity
1. Who?
2. What?
3. Where?
4. When?
5. Why?
6. How?
I keep six honest serving-men
(They taught me all I knew);
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who.
1. What? (object of production)
2. Who? (subject of production)
3. How? (method of operation)
4. Where? (space of production)
5. When? (time of production)
6. Why? (applies to all the five elements noted above)
1. What is to be produced? The medical swab
2. Who is producing it? Machines or workers
3. How are we producing it? The different operations the process goes through from raw materials to the end sterile product
4. Where are we producing it? Space utilization: this includes the storage area at incoming, the QC lab for inspection, the storage area for inventory, the clean room for actual production, and again the storage area at the end.
5. When? This includes the duration and timing.
1. Why do we need this object?
2. Why do we require this subject?
3. Why use this kind of method?
4. Why this kind of space utilization?
5. Why this kind of time?Final words
1. Analyze the facts in detail.
2. Pursue work goals by asking the question “Why?” at least three times.
3. Bear in mind that there are several means to any one goal.
4. Identify the “one best way” to perform the task in the present circumstances.
“Time is merely a shadow of motion. Supervisors frequently put pressure on plant workers to speed up their work, to get jobs done more quickly. Yet simply working faster—without improving the motions that take up the time—will not speed things up in the final analysis. Time is merely a shadow of motion, and no matter how much we may complain about shadows, nothing will happen unless we deal with the substance—motion—that throws the shadow.”
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Harish Jose
© 2022 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.
Comments
MODAPTS Tracks Employee Motion in Detail
Manufacturers around the globe use MODAPTS to analyze and optimize employee motion during production, just as Shingo suggested.
In service industries, value stream mapping and spaghetti diagramming eliminate unnecessary delays and motion which consume up to 57 minutes of every hour. I call this the 3-57 rule. Employees are only working on the product or service 3 minutes out of every hour.
It's possible to cut cycle time by 50% or more in most unanalyzed processes. Few companies embrace speed as the "healing app."
Critical Thinking
Excellent article! Thanks for breaking down the 'boxes' that now-'conventional' wisdom is contained in, and constrained by -- for seeing that such 'wisdom', although useful and powerful, is still at root, just an idea ..... and that ideas can still be extended, and even more useful and powerful ideas can be creatively thought, and applied. "There are many means", to be creatively discovered, and discovered, and discovered.