{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Is Quality Only for Operations?

Rooting out the mindset that ‘quality isn’t relevant here’

Arun Hariharan
Tue, 12/08/2015 - 17:54
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

During my years of experience helping companies with quality, I’ve observed that in some, any conversation and initiatives related to quality seem to revolve around operations. In manufacturing companies, this tends to be the actual production plant or factory; in service companies, it’s their core operations and customer service areas.

Proof of this limiting mindset is the fact that, in some companies, the quality head reports to the operations head. In other words, the quality department is a subset of operations. In my experience, this immediately prevents, or at least limits, quality from spreading to areas other than operations.

Nobody can deny that operations is an important area for focus on quality initiatives. However, by restricting quality focus only to operations, are some organizations failing to get the full benefits that their quality programs potentially offer?

Isn’t quality—which includes standardized processes, customer focus, efficiency, waste consciousness, performance measurement, and continuous improvement—applicable to sales to HR to admin to (of all things) innovation?

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Alan Metzel on Fri, 12/11/2015 - 08:23

Quality for Quality

Physician heal thyself! If quality is to provide proper service to its customers, it would behoove them to exam their own practices, deliverables and metrics.

  • Reply

Submitted by Arun Hariharan on Sun, 12/13/2015 - 20:52

Quality touch for the quality department

Absolutely agree with Alan. Standardized processes, performance measurements, deliverables linked to business priorities - in short the "quality touch" - is as applicable to the quality "department" as to others.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us