{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Napoleon’s Defeat Made Visual

One picture represents 410,000 lives

Gwendolyn Galsworth
Tue, 11/29/2016 - 15:09
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Often enough, you have heard me say that 50 percent of our brain function is dedicated to finding and then interpreting visual data. This is not whimsy. This is not speculation. This is fact. The eye rules. Though we utilize our other senses quite naturally (sound, taste, smell, touch), visuality rules. We are sight-dominant beings.

Visual information sharing has played a long and dramatic role in the West—but not always in the ways you might expect. Let’s take for an example the superb visual depiction of a disaster that almost no words could describe.

The depiction is a graph made by Charles Joseph Minard, a civil engineer and map maker in 19th century France (below). The disaster was the loss of more than 410,000 soldiers on Napoleon’s catastrophic march on Moscow in his ill-fated Russian Campaign of 1812. Napoleon didn’t just lose that campaign, he decimated his army. But it wasn’t until the publication of M. Minard’s graph in the 1860s—some 50 years later—that the full impact of Napoleon’s defeat was grasped. Our eye understands more than we can explain in a few words. A thousand different comparisons are made—instantly. And we get it.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Donald J. Wheeler on Tue, 11/29/2016 - 10:02

Thanks

I have this picture on my wall to remind me of the power of a good graphic.

  • Reply

Submitted by NT3327 on Thu, 12/01/2016 - 08:30

Process mapping

I had a copy of this image on my door a couple of employers ago. Someone was walking by one day and stopped to take a look. They saw me in my office and said (kiddingly, for the most part), "When I first saw this, I thought it was a comment on our product development process."

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us