Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Libby Sander
Seven tips to boost well-being and productivity
Matt Fieldman
It’s vital that we address social determinants of work
Lisa Wong Macabasco
Challenging stereotypes without sacrificing likability
Lite Nartey
Firms can enhance cooperation and reduce conflict by understanding the different dimensions of stakeholder dialogue
Bruce Hamilton
Will lean thinking inform the designers of AI?

More Features

Management News
Gartner survey reveals how organizations are developing their use of AI
While many executives believe themselves immune, research says otherwise.
Tactics aim to improve job quality and retain a high-performing workforce
Increases Xcelerator capabilities for climate-neutral aviation
Demonstrating a commitment to keeping people safe and organizations running
Sept. 28–29, 2022, at the MassMutual Center in Springfield, MA
EPM service provider excels in helping customers work with EPM products
It’s not exactly a labor shortage

More News

Gwendolyn Galsworth

Management

Napoleon’s Defeat Made Visual

One picture represents 410,000 lives

Published: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 - 16:09

Often enough, you have heard me say that 50 percent of our brain function is dedicated to finding and then interpreting visual data. This is not whimsy. This is not speculation. This is fact. The eye rules. Though we utilize our other senses quite naturally (sound, taste, smell, touch), visuality rules. We are sight-dominant beings.

Visual information sharing has played a long and dramatic role in the West—but not always in the ways you might expect. Let’s take for an example the superb visual depiction of a disaster that almost no words could describe.

The depiction is a graph made by Charles Joseph Minard, a civil engineer and map maker in 19th century France (below). The disaster was the loss of more than 410,000 soldiers on Napoleon’s catastrophic march on Moscow in his ill-fated Russian Campaign of 1812. Napoleon didn’t just lose that campaign, he decimated his army. But it wasn’t until the publication of M. Minard’s graph in the 1860s—some 50 years later—that the full impact of Napoleon’s defeat was grasped. Our eye understands more than we can explain in a few words. A thousand different comparisons are made—instantly. And we get it.


Click here for larger image.

Start on the far left and follow the thick beige band as it travels right and dwindles—and then pivots at the far right and retreats (black band) into practical nothingness on the far left again—the advance and retreat of Napoleon’s Grande Armée.

The wide band on the far left represents the size of Napoleon’s army when it crossed into Russia on June 14, 1812: 422,000 soldiers. As the army marches towards Moscow (Napoleon’s prize), the width of the band narrows, with each millimeter of decrease equivalent to the loss of 10,000 men. As he moved further and further into the Russian Motherland, Bonaparte lost thousands of his troops in skirmishes—and thousands more to the swiftly-arriving winter and to Russia’s scorched-earth tactic in which retreating forces destroyed villages, crops, and livestock in order to leave the invading army with no shelter or food—the same tactic that would later defeat Hitler more than a century later in almost identical circumstances.

When Napoleon finally entered Moscow in September (far right of the graph), he found it deserted and burning. After only a month, Napoleon headed west again, this time searching to do battle with the Russian Army which wisely avoided him. Winter fell in all its frozen whiteness and Napoleon went into full retreat, with less than 27,000 troops of the original 422,000 remaining. On December 14, 1812, the remainder of the Grande Armée—less than 10,000 soldiers—crossed out of Russia and headed back to France. Napoleon, severely shaken by his utter defeat, raced ahead in sled and carriage to Paris to attempt spin control. Two years later he was defeated at Waterloo, having never recovered from the disastrous Russian Campaign.

And it is all there in Minard’s visual depiction. Books have been written aplenty on this gruesome slice of history. But the power of visuality brings home the incredible toll of that war, at a glance—a long hard glance. Why not bring the power of visuality into your own company—only this time to help you win the war on waste and score a lasting victory of your business and cultural success? Let the workplace speak.

First published Oct. 19, 2016, on the Visual Thinking blog.

Discuss

About The Author

Gwendolyn Galsworth’s picture

Gwendolyn Galsworth

Gwendolyn Galsworth, Ph.D., has been implementing visuality for more than 30 years. She’s focused on codifying the visual workplace concepts, principles, and technologies into a single, coherent sustainable framework of knowledge. Galsworth founded Visual Thinking Inc. in 1991, and in 2005 she launched The Visual-Lean Institute where in-house trainers and external consultants are trained and certified in the Institute’s nine core visual workplace methods. Two of the seven books Galsworth has written received the Shingo Research and Professional Publication Award.

Comments

Process mapping

I had a copy of this image on my door a couple of employers ago. Someone was walking by one day and stopped to take a look. They saw me in my office and said (kiddingly, for the most part), "When I first saw this, I thought it was a comment on our product development process."

Thanks

I have this picture on my wall to remind me of the power of a good graphic.