Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Elliot Dratch
What’s your plan for growth?
Dawn Bailey
MESA’s business involves excavating and working on high-pressure pipelines carrying hydrocarbon liquids and gas
Kimberly Merriman
At issue are scant remote-work resources, updated policies on flexibility, and communication from leadership
Michael Lee Stallard
How important—and challenging—our human relationships can be
Carlos Valdes-Dapena
Follow these three simple rules to address team dysfunction

More Features

Management News
Siemens introduces PCBflow, a secure, cloud-based solution for accelerating design-to-manufacturing handoff for printed circuit boards
Includes global overview and new additive manufacturing section
Tech aggravation can lead to issues with employee engagement, customer experience, and business results
Harnessing the forces that drive your organizations success
Free education source for global medical device community
New standard for safe generator use created by the industry’s own PGMA with the assistance of industry experts
Provides synchronization, compliance, traceability, and transparency within processes
Galileo’s Telescope describes how to measure success at the top of the organization, translate down to every level of supervision
Too often process enhancements occur in silos where there is little positive impact on the big picture

More News

Jose Luis Alvarez


What Ails Corporate Executive Committees?

CEOs should sharpen their most important strategy execution tool

Published: Monday, February 22, 2021 - 13:02

Alexander Hamilton, one of the United States’ founding fathers, famously called energy the most important characteristic of the executive branch of government. “A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the government,” he said in the Federalist Papers. “A feeble execution is but another phrase for a bad execution; and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in practice, a bad government.” Contemporary corporate CEOs should heed Hamilton’s warning.

No matter how capable CEOs might be, they need the help of a trusted team: an executive committee of senior managers who report directly to them, meeting regularly to help shape the collective work of the enterprise. CEOs and their executive committees (excos) are the veritable energy reactors of organizations.

However, my counseling experience indicates widespread dissatisfaction with these committees among both leaders and members. Research shows that the problems faced by excos are so widespread that effective teams are rare, and work well only when they fit the CEO’s leadership style.

Divided we fall

To analyze the causes of executive committee dysfunction and propose remedies, let’s first look at what separates them from teams lower in the hierarchy. For one thing, excos operate where strategic uncertainty is highest, making decisions that cover a range of external contingencies, from economic (e.g., main clients and suppliers), political (e.g., relationships with governments), to social (e.g., Black Lives Matter movement).  

It follows that executive committees grapple with complex decisions and tasks for which there might be no established rules and routines. Individual values and styles therefore play a crucial role. But the flip side is that differences among members might be difficult to reconcile. Meanwhile, both the substance and symbolism of the team’s decisions are watched closely by the rest of the organization.

What does an underperforming, even dysfunctional executive committee look like, then? There are four common symptoms, top of which is fragmentation. Exco members have two concurrent roles: full-time head of business or functional units and part-time exco member. The former function often overshadows the latter, turning excos into a mere collective of senior executives pursuing their own agendas, with little cohesion or collaboration. 

Bigger problems ensue when the CEO, hobbled by a fragmented and problematic team, makes decisions in isolation to avoid conflict. Avoidance also takes the form of exco members systematically evading confrontation among themselves. I have often seen executives going through the motions at exco meetings without tackling any controversial issues, trying to avoid retaliation and certainly not asking for help. They just want to appear positive during their “air time” and for the session to finish as quickly as possible. 

The third problem is that, even today, many senior executives have built their careers on being non-consultative and individualistic—a style not so compatible with the teamwork needed in an executive committee. Associated with such individualism is rivalry for the top job. Competition among senior executives for the CEO job may undermine collaboration before succession and even after, due to lingering animosity.

Building a better executive team

The most fundamental rule of the design of top management teams is the primacy of the CEO. Richard Hackman, a prominent expert on teams, and his co-authors observe in their book Senior Leadership Teams: What It Takes to Make Them Great, “there is no fixed set of steps to follow in structuring, launching, and leading senior teams... great leaders draw on their particular skills and preferences to create these conditions in ways that are tuned to the unique circumstances in which their teams operate.”

In a Harvard Business Review article, corporate consultant Bob Frisch likewise emphasizes the CEO’s role in this quote from Tom Wilson, CEO of Allstate: “Ed Brennan, the late CEO of American department store chain Sears, Roebuck and Co., told me that an organizational structure should be based on who you are—what your personality is as a leader. I used to think that was wrong, but now I realize that’s the only way an organization can function.” 

CEOs may find the following recommendations on creating and running executive committees helpful. First, the formal exco should comprise executives that support the CEO in decisions that are critical, strategic, and integral to the organization. When that is not possible—since new CEOs often inherit a team—leaders may consider having an ad hoc team or even a "kitchen cabinet” of trusted executives for key decisions. More extensive groups with open and evolving membership can focus on counseling, generating ideas, and other functions.

Second, excos should have only five to eight members. Any bigger, like the 20-member boards of some commercial banks, would only render it sluggish.

Third, remember that excos are not representative but decision-making teams. Instead of including all heads of business units or functions, it should only comprise those with a generalist purview and organizational integration capabilities. Others may be invited to sit in at meetings for specific issues.

Fourth, the top team should adopt different decision-making methodologies depending on the issue at hand: consensus for noncritical topics, dialectic for strategic debates, and so on.

Fifth, executives should be evaluated and adequately compensated for their exco contributions. Having “skin in the game” would induce them to take the organization’s perspective rather than pursuing parochial interests.

Sixth, CEOs could use the executive committee to identify and groom potential successors or to fast-track the careers of the most promising members. For instance, members could take turns to chair meetings for noncritical issues.

Finally, and by no means the least important recommendation, increase diversity at the top. Fully one-quarter of Stoxx Europe 600 leading companies do not have any woman in their executive board or committee. This will soon change, at least in Germany, which is introducing a mandatory quota for female representation in listed firms’ senior management. Legal and ethical considerations aside, diversity in top management has also been shown to be good for innovation and the bottom line.

To lead with energy, CEOs cannot bank on their sheer force of personality and talent alone. Well-constituted executive committees attuned to CEOs and the needs of the organization can prevent the executive from ever turning feeble.

First published Feb. 2, 2021, on INSEAD’s Knowledge blog.


About The Author

Jose Luis Alvarez’s picture

Jose Luis Alvarez

José Luis Álvarez is the Mubadala Chair in corporate governance and strategy as well as a senior affiliate professor of organizational behavior at INSEAD.