Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Andy J. Yap
When organizations merge, people must come together
Gene Russell
Resources to help increase your financial literacy
Michael King
Augmenting and empowering life-science professionals
Meg Sinclair
100% real, 100% anonymized, 100% scary
Mike Figliuolo
The customer isn’t always right

More Features

Management News
For companies using TLS 1.3 while performing required audits on incoming internet traffic
Accelerates service and drives manufacturing profitability
New video in the NIST ‘Heroes’ series
A tool to help detect sinister email
Developing tools to measure and improve trustworthiness
Manufacturers embrace quality management to improve operations, minimize risk
How well are women supported after landing technical positions?

More News

Narayan Pant


Tips for Leaders to Gain Actionable and Informed Feedback From Their Peers

It doesn’t have to be lonely at the top

Published: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 - 11:02

Sami, a manager in a multinational company, had to make a difficult decision concerning an underperforming direct report. To complicate the situation further, the subordinate in question was a contender for Sami’s job and friendly with Sami’s current boss. Sami’s boss had seemingly left all decisions to him, telling Sami, “You’re the boss; you make the decision that’s right.”

Sami now had to decide whether he should fire his recalcitrant subordinate and was left grappling with his own doubts and fears about the potential repercussions. His boss had said it was his decision, but did she mean it? What if she resented his choice to fire someone she liked and supported? Was he biased in his assessment, especially given that his subordinate was a contender for his position? Would a more capable leader be able to persuade this subordinate to be more productive?

Sami’s group of friends had varied advice. One person said that not firing the subordinate would be a sign of weakness. Another suggested that he should sideline the subordinate and encourage him to leave, that way avoiding his boss’s wrath. Sami wasn’t convinced until someone reminded him about how loyal he’d always been to his company and asked, “What’s right for the company?”

All of a sudden, the fog lifted, and he could think clearly again. The comment reminded him of his values, and that, in turn, made his decision clear.

The wisdom of the crowd

All leaders benefit from having people they can turn to when facing difficult decisions. However, most people I meet tend to disagree. You might think, “Oh, they can’t know my context,” or, “It’s complicated, and it will take too much time for me to explain it.” You may even think, “It’s very confidential, you know; I can’t tell just anyone what’s happening.”

These reasons are insignificant and probably inaccurate. Try not to dwell on them. If you must, focus on how not asking others for feedback helps you. Maybe it helps you avoid hearing something you don’t want to hear. Or maybe it helps you postpone the inevitable. Don’t do anything with your speculation—just file it away.

Once you suspend your objections to seeking feedback for difficult decisions, you can implement the following guidelines to maximize the value you receive from the advice.

1. Get feedback from people with no skin in the game

You’ll naturally question the value of feedback from people you consider biased. Unfortunately, many people you encounter will seem biased because they may gain or lose from your decisions.

Take Sami’s case. Whom did he encounter daily? Members of his team, some of whom wanted to take over the responsibilities of their recalcitrant colleague, and others who wanted to get Sami into trouble. Even Sami’s wife was biased toward courses of action that reduced his workload so he could spend more time at home. So, Sami turned to a different kind of group for feedback.

He first encountered this group in an executive program. Because they came from different companies, they weren’t invested in each other’s decisions and could speak openly with each other. They were so encouraged by the value of the feedback they received that they continued consulting one another long after the program ended.

2. Consult informed respondents

Feedback is more valuable when it comes from people who are at least somewhat informed about the decision you are making. These individuals don’t need to be experts (there are some circumstances in which experts can even be harmful due to overconfidence in their judgments), but they must have informed insights.

Sami’s group consisted of people with similar levels of seniority who had all had dealt with difficult performance issues. None of them was an “expert” on performance issues, but they could all share how they thought they would respond if they had to make the decision.

3. Solicit independent opinions

Subjects in experiments tend to give answers they guess the experimenters want, just to be nice. Similarly, friends tend to be “nice” and offer their friends the answers they think they are looking for. However, the value of feedback lies in the independence between different respondents and the person seeking feedback. Hence, Sami and his friends had to work hard at offering independent opinions—and resist being nice—when asked for feedback.

They protected independence in several ways. First, they reminded each other to be honest—“nice is the enemy of helpful” became a refrain. Second, they sent each other feedback in writing before having one-on-one conversations. Also, they didn’t give feedback in the presence of others in case their feedback was influenced by what they heard. All members believed they received independent and truthful feedback from other group members.

4. Ensure a reasonable degree of diversity

The “wisdom of the crowd” refers to the discovery that a group of independent, informed people can form superior judgments compared to individuals, even when the individuals are experts in their fields. Key conditions to maximizing the wisdom from crowds include those discussed earlier—independence and being informed, supplemented with a reasonable degree of diversity.

In the environment in which Sami found his “crowd,” diversity was baked into the process. Participants came from diverse companies, industries, and countries, all of which fostered diversity in perspectives. However, many contexts have lower levels of diversity. Still, individuals can aspire to seek diverse opinions.

People I meet in Japanese organizations, where there is generally lower diversity in gender or educational background, can predict the feedback their colleagues will give them. When encouraged, they find that soliciting feedback from people of different genders and educational backgrounds can enrich their understanding of the problem at hand.

It’s lonely out there, but it doesn’t need to be. All leaders benefit from receiving feedback on difficult decisions, and the value of the feedback they receive is greater if respondents are unbiased, independent, informed, and diverse.

First published March 6, 2023, on INSEAD


About The Author

Narayan Pant’s picture

Narayan Pant

Professor Narayan Pant directs INSEAD’s senior leadership program and has expertise in strategy within leadership. He has written and taught on these topics at New York University’s Stern School, the University of Alberta, and the National University of Singapore. Besides research, writing, and teaching, Pant has consulted for multiple industries, including pharmaceuticals, healthcare, financial services, and retail. He currently works for INSEAD and owns his own firm, Clean Slate Consulting.