Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Gleb Tsipursky
Only a third of organizations have hybrid policies in place
Joe Judge
How you do anything is how you do everything
Stephanie Ojeda
How addressing customer concerns benefits the entire quality process
Shiela Mie Legaspi
Set SMART goals
Mike Figliuolo
Creating a guiding maxim helps your people think ahead, too

More Features

Management News
For companies using TLS 1.3 while performing required audits on incoming internet traffic
Accelerates service and drives manufacturing profitability
New video in the NIST ‘Heroes’ series
A tool to help detect sinister email
Developing tools to measure and improve trustworthiness
Manufacturers embrace quality management to improve operations, minimize risk
How well are women supported after landing technical positions?

More News

Bryan Christiansen

Management

The Relationship Between Maintenance and Reliability

A united approach to asset management can boost revenue

Published: Thursday, April 6, 2023 - 11:02

People often use the terms maintenance and reliability interchangeably. However, they are two separate concepts. Although there is some overlap, their scope and focus are quite different.

Understanding those differences, as well as how each concept affects the other, is a necessary step for optimizing your assets’ performance.

Defining maintenance

The ISO 14224 standard defines maintenance as a “combination of all technical and administrative actions, including supervisory actions, intended to retain an item, in or restore it to, a state in which it can perform a required function.”

In other words, maintenance encompasses all of the reactive and proactive actions we take to keep assets in optimal working condition.

Equipment is designed to perform a function. Maintenance ensures it functions as designed.

Defining reliability

The same standard defines reliability as the “ability of an item to perform a required function under given conditions for a given time interval.”

This definition keeps the “required function” component of the maintenance definition but introduces two new variables: time and condition. This implies that maintenance is a part of reliability, with reliability being a much broader concept that includes an asset’s operating context.

Maintenance as a subset of reliability

The easiest way to understand the relationship between maintenance and reliability is to look at how they fit into the concept of asset management.

Asset management represents all actions an organization takes to manage assets throughout their life cycles—from planning a purchase to asset disposal.

Reliability is a subset of asset management and refers to the tactics used to maximize the equipment’s reliability and availability, given the conditions in which it works.

Maintenance is again a subset of reliability, referring to the day-to-day tasks of fixing and maintaining assets to improve equipment reliability and performance.

In other words, both maintenance and reliability support asset management and help companies reach their business goals.

The difference between maintenance and reliability

The main goal of the maintenance actions we take—and the reliability techniques we apply—is to minimize downtime and ensure high levels of asset performance. But here is where the similarity ends.

To understand how they differ, we have to talk about the way a piece of equipment is designed. 

Imagine an asset that isn’t performing as reliably as it was designed to. Ramping up its preventive maintenance program is likely to result in improved asset reliability and performance. However, beyond a certain point, it doesn’t matter how well you maintain an item. You will never exceed the level of reliability that has been built into the asset without changing its design.

Reliability, on the other hand, isn’t limited in the same way. If a piece of equipment needs to be redesigned or modified to work better within the organization’s specific operating conditions, reliability engineers can make that happen.

Here’s an example of how reliability and maintenance work together. Let’s assume an original equipment manufacturer supplies a specific pump model and capacity to a manufacturing business. However, an analysis of the pump’s performance over a year indicates an unacceptable number of leaks caused by mechanical seal failures.

Maintenance already has a preventive maintenance regime in place to inspect the seals after a certain number of operating hours. They try to solve the problem by applying the following tactics:
• Test the same form, fit, and function of mechanical seals manufactured by different OEMs.
• Implement condition monitoring to send an alert when seal degradation reaches a predetermined point.
• Increase the min./max levels of the mechanical seals in stock.
• Develop a quick-change pump unit to ensure the pump can be removed and replaced with the least disruption to production while seal replacement occurs in the workshop.

All these measures result in mildly improved reliability and fewer breakdowns, improving availability. Unfortunately, these actions also led to higher maintenance costs and increased administrative burdens.

Reliability engineers decide to analyze the pump specifications, operation, and maintenance. They conclude that operating conditions in the factory may be the root cause of the pump’s low reliability.

They test a different pump design fitted with labyrinth oil seals rather than the mechanical ones used in the original pump. They also recommend ways the production can be modified to minimize pump stop/start cycles.

Post-modification testing shows an improved mean time between failures due to fewer seal failures, lower maintenance costs, and improved equipment availability.

The interdependence of maintenance and reliability

The example below illustrates how interdependent maintenance and reliability really are.

Reliability depends on maintenance for a stable, efficient, and optimized program to deliver useful data and maximum achievable reliability.

Maintenance, on the other hand, is very task-focused. It needs reliability to analyze, research, design, and modify equipment to improve reliability and availability once maintenance has reached maximum cost efficiency.

Although their tasks are very different, when combined, these two disciplines produce financial results that are more than the sum of their parts.

Creating a united front

A perfect maintenance strategy, executed efficiently, still may not provide acceptable reliability.

Similarly, an organization with acceptable reliability doesn’t necessarily mean the maintenance program is at its best or is efficiently executed.

By recognizing the relationship between maintenance and reliability, and encouraging a united approach to asset management, an organization can increase production capacity, reduce maintenance costs, lower costs of asset ownership, and ultimately boost its revenue.

First published March 1, 2023, on the Limble CMMS blog.

Discuss

About The Author

Bryan Christiansen’s picture

Bryan Christiansen

Bryan Christiansen is the founder and CEO of Limble CMMS. Limble is a modern, easy-to-use mobile CMMS software that takes the stress and chaos out of maintenance by helping managers organize, automate, and streamline their maintenance operations.

Comments

Upside down

The reliability definition used by the author is actually  narrowing down the scope of reliability by introducing the time interval constraint. It therefore seems like a misunderstanding when the conclusion in the article ends up with the complete opposite by broadening the reliability definition.

Maintenance is better viewed as the processes realizing reliability. And with that perspective it is reliability that will be a subset of maintenance in a manufacturing environment.

Businesses have notoriously been bad at maintenance management with poor reliability as as the outcome. As a result, there seems to be a pressure to redefine reliability, and I suspect this pressure is mainly from reliability consultants. But as clearly defined by ISO, prevention and administrative tasks are a part of maintenance. This obviously includes, analysis of failures, long term thinking, improvements, etc.