Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Sara Harrison
Ask younger colleagues to train them
Harry Hertz
Nine takeaways from Baldrige recipients
Nate Burke
Create a frictionless customer experience
Knowledge at Wharton
Question your assumptions
Lee Seok Hwai
CEO discretion varies from industry to industry and firm to firm

More Features

Management News
Siemens introduces PCBflow, a secure, cloud-based solution for accelerating design-to-manufacturing handoff for printed circuit boards
Includes global overview and new additive manufacturing section
Tech aggravation can lead to issues with employee engagement, customer experience, and business results
Harnessing the forces that drive your organizations success
Free education source for global medical device community
New standard for safe generator use created by the industry’s own PGMA with the assistance of industry experts
Provides synchronization, compliance, traceability, and transparency within processes
Galileo’s Telescope describes how to measure success at the top of the organization, translate down to every level of supervision
Too often process enhancements occur in silos where there is little positive impact on the big picture

More News

Sébastien Breteau


Quality Control in the Tariff-Challenged Supply Chain

New sourcing markets emphasize the classic quality-speed-cost constraint—with quality the most likely to lose out

Published: Thursday, September 12, 2019 - 12:03

Whether it be a move forced by the U.S.-China tariff turmoil, or a sourcing strategy long in the works, the exodus from China is a reality for a host of businesses, from small to medium-sized enterprises to multinationals.

While the departure is widespread, it isn’t universal—some major players, Nike and Intel among them, openly announce they have no intention to pull out of China, in a large part due to its importance as a consumer market. However, for businesses in pursuit of low-cost outsourcing, China is becoming an increasingly less feasible choice. With Vietnam—arguably the biggest beneficiary from the trade war fallout—almost at capacity, global supply chains in price-sensitive consumer goods segments are exploring new sourcing horizons.

That said, shifting one’s supply chain into a new country is never a trouble-free process. In the classic project management triangle of quality vs. speed vs. cost, only two facets out of three are available at any given time. The latest data collected by quality and compliance solution provider QIMA indicate that as buyers move into new sourcing regions, the quality dimension is the most likely to suffer.

In a global survey of more than 150 businesses in industries such as textiles and apparel, footwear, promotional products, toys, electronics, and other major consumer goods segments, more than three-quarters of respondents indicated that they have already started sourcing suppliers in new regions in 2019, or plan to do so before the year is out. As companies move their production out of China, they tend to head to a number of countries in South and Southeast Asia, although near-shoring continues to gain in popularity among U.S. and EU businesses alike.

Controlling a new supply chain

While this ongoing diversification helps companies optimize costs and side-step tariff concerns, it also brings new challenges. Almost 30 percent of survey respondents noted that gaining control of their general supply-chain processes (such as procurement, manufacturing, storage, and logistics) in new sourcing regions was the most noticeable impact of their supply chain diversification. When examining specific sourcing concerns, more than 44 percent of respondents cited product quality as a high-priority challenge of working with suppliers in new countries. Other serious challenges included finding adequate production capacity (43%) and meeting production deadlines (36%). This indicates that the speed dimension of the project management triangle is an issue as well.

Data gathered during onsite quality control checks show that businesses’ concerns about new regions are far from baseless. As a rule, the less mature the sourcing market, the more likely it is to struggle with quality issues. A vivid example of this is Cambodia, where local suppliers are enjoying increased demand from overseas buyers—but lack the time or resources necessary to establish proper quality management processes or train new personnel. As a result, more than 40 percent of all goods inspected in Cambodian factories during the second quarter of 2019 were found outside of acceptable quality limits (compare that with China, where 25 percent of inspection reports made during that same time reported out-of-spec issues, a +13-percent, year-over-year improvement).

By comparison, Turkey, a more mature market for apparel, handled the increased production pace better. After a brief spike in quality issues around the turn of year, local suppliers succeeded at pushing the inspection failure rate below 25 percent during the second quarter of 2019—despite the influx of new orders from European buyers, for whom Turkey represents a prime geography for near-shoring.

South Asia product quality has deteriorated

Meanwhile, the positive correlation between sourcing-region maturity and manufacturing quality doesn’t seem to hold up in South Asia, based on product quality data from the ground. This region of textile powerhouses is enjoying renewed popularity with U.S. buyers, but product quality there has notably deteriorated since the start of 2019. In India, 33 percent of all goods inspected during the second quarter of 2019 (including almost 40 percent of all textile and apparel products) failed to meet client specifications, while quality failure rates were even higher in Pakistan. Both countries are seasoned textile and apparel producers, and India in particular has been hard at work during the past few years carving out a path toward innovation in textiles, with new technologies and automation.

Then why such depressing quality performance? The most likely explanation is the speed-cost-quality triangle at work again. After all, a business that moves regions to chase low costs is more likely to choose a low-balling bidder within the new country, and a low manufacturer price point tends to translate to small facilities and manual labor, especially in the textile and apparel sectors.

In summary, the trends observed on the ground, and the business sentiment expressed through the survey, point to the same takeaway: This period of global trade uncertainty, and the resultant shift away from China, is definitely not the time to let quality concerns fall by the wayside. On the contrary, when expanding a supply chain into new sourcing markets, buyers must increase their focus on product quality and safety, especially when it comes to moving from established sourcing regions to less mature ones.


About The Author

Sébastien Breteau’s picture

Sébastien Breteau

Sébastien Breteau is the founder and CEO of QIMA, a quality control and compliance service provider that partners with brands, retailers and importers to secure and manage their global supply chain. Breteau has more than 20 years of experience in supply chain management, founding his first sourcing company in 1997. 

Founded in 2005, QIMA has become a leading player in Asia and has expanded its operations globally to more than 35 labs and offices, 3,800 employees, and operating in 85 countries. In 2020, the company launched QIMAone, a collaborative platform that digitizes quality and compliance management for global brands, retailers, and manufacturers.