{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow

Why workplace ghosting is on the rise

Knowledge at Wharton
Wed, 02/27/2019 - 12:03
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

In the 1999 film Office Space, a dark comedy about the mundane conventionality of work, disgruntled software engineer Peter Gibbons tells his new love interest, Joanna, that he hates his job and doesn’t want to go anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Joanna, played by actress Jennifer Aniston, asks Peter whether he is going to quit, he responds, “Not really; I’m just going to stop going.”

What was once a funny work of fiction is becoming an increasingly common reality as more employers report being “ghosted” by job applicants and employees who simply disappear without a trace. In fact, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago cited an uptick in ghosting in its December 2018 economic activity report, and an array of media outlets—including The Washington Post and Business Insider—have been publishing stories recently about the pitfalls of the practice.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by Michael Goodsell on Wed, 02/27/2019 - 11:27

Boo Hoo

Peter Cappelli has nailed it and Jay Finkelman is clutching to an old paradigm.

 

The reality has always been employees are a commodity to employers. Employers have always been an option to employees.  Just like I can buy Pepsi, coke, RC or generic cola, someone else can chose to go to another grocery store to buy whatever they want.

 

Yes, the employer has a lot of candidates to rply to, but over the last 10 years or so, the candidates have had a lot of employers to respond to. If brushing one side off is acceptable, so is brushing off the other.

 

If you think a little harder, you will see the employer has the resources to actually be civil. They are the ones with an ongoing income. The job seeker is desperately trying to swing how to pay the rent, put food on the table, and keep the kids clothed all while trying to send as many applications as possible. Now here comes the $1m revenue company crying because they have to take time to have a computer send form letters to all the applicants that didn’t get picked.

 

Sorry, but I have no pity for them.

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us