Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Management Features
Ryan E. Day
September Speaker Series in review
Eric Stoop
Data can make a major difference to plant efficiency without causing the manufacturer major upheaval
Harish Jose
Why jidoka and JIT?
Mark Williams
Take the time to see how you can do what’s right for the majority of people, the majority of the time
Ryan E. Day
Bespoke jewelry company Gemist says yes

More Features

Management News
Latest installment of North American Manufacturing Covid-19 Survey Series shows 38% of surveyed companies are hiring
How to develop an effective strategic plan and make the best major decisions in the context of uncertainty and ambiguity
What continual improvement, change, and innovation are, and how they apply to performance improvement
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth
Further enhances change management capabilities
Awards to be presented March 24, 2020, at the Quest for Excellence Conference, in National Harbor, MD
Workers more at ease about job security. Millennials more confident regarding wages.
46% of creative workers want video games in the office

More News

Manfred Kets de Vries

Management

Corporate Ideal: The ‘Authentizotic’ Organization

Where fair processes meet commitment

Published: Monday, January 8, 2018 - 13:01

The CEO of Wickrott Corp. was known as a suspicious control freak. Symptomatic of his leadership style were the numerous “internal consultants” hired to keep him informed of the goings-on in the organization. Staff described their work environment as a cutthroat, Darwinian “soup.” Information was power; secrecy was the norm; transparency and teamwork were conspicuous by their absence.

To add to the company’s paranoid culture, the CEO demanded presigned resignation letters from all of his senior executives so that he could fire them on the spot if he felt that they had transgressed. At meetings, he frequently subjected them to abusive, even profane tirades. During these humiliating sessions, he made it quite clear that the firm owed every bit of its success to him alone.

At the Upling Corp., by contrast, great efforts were made to ensure that every staff member was aligned behind the firm’s values, mission, and vision. Senior executives emphasized the importance of a coaching-oriented, people-centric culture. Employees were proud of the organization because it offered mutual support, promoted trust, and provided them with meaning. Pay was decent, and the benefits were excellent. Senior management encouraged people to speak up, come up with new ideas, and take risks. In particular, entrepreneurial activities were advocated. Work-life balance was taken seriously, and the company strived to be a good corporate citizen for the community and the world at large.

The ‘authentizotic’ organization

As this juxtaposition of corporate hell and heaven illustrates, work environments can range from the awful to the awesome. For many executives the million-dollar question is: How to shoot for the latter? Based on my decades of academic and consulting experience, I would like to make a few observations on how leaders can create high-performing, sustainable organizations where people can be and give their best.

I call these organizations “authentizotic,” a term I created by combining two Greek words: authentikos and zootikos. As a workplace label, authentikos implies an organization characterized by fair processes. Such a workplace emphasizes self-actualization, producing a sense of effectiveness, competency, autonomy, and creativity. The term zootikos means “vital to life.” It describes an environment in which people are invigorated by their work; able to find balance, commitment, and completeness; and fulfill their need for exploration.

The basis for developing authentizotic organizations is trust. A number of ingredients are needed to foster this, and it all starts at the top.

Developing trust

Trust is earned when actions meet words. We trust forthright leaders who walk the talk and set an example by working with integrity. Consistency in actions is also a critical factor in building trust. This implies living up to one’s commitments and promises.

Furthermore, leaders should be prepared to show their emotions when appropriate; they should demonstrate that they care. Trust, however, is not only affected by the ability to express emotions, but also by the way these emotions are conveyed. For example, volatile anger doesn’t help an organization. In addition, senior managers need to have confidence in their team and acknowledge individual efforts and contributions so everyone feels valued.

In authentizotic organizations, senior management listens carefully to what people have to say. This means paying attention not only to the story that’s told, but also to its underlying meaning, the language used, the tone of voice, and last but not least, the body language. Equally important is to listen to what’s left unsaid. Furthermore, senior executives should feel sufficiently secure to show vulnerability through admitting (when appropriate) that they don’t have all the answers.

Trusted executives unconditionally invite their subordinates to express their opinions. They make it clear that people can disagree, and that disagreement is part of the creative process. They present failure as a great learning opportunity. They personify ethics and also set clear boundaries for what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Such boundaries, like in childhood, contribute to the creation of feelings of safety. Only when people feel safe will they be comfortable to speak up in an organizational setting. They will not be afraid to be seen as incompetent, ignorant, or disruptive.

The clinical paradigm: A well-tested method for change

Authentizotic organizations have what I call C4 in their DNA: They embed courageous conversations within a coaching culture. And I have designed a well-tested intervention method to help leaders create such a culture. Its main goals are to build trust, to alleviate concerns about reciprocity in dealing with sensitive issues, and to deter lingering paranoid reactions. It’s about overcoming fear of the negative consequences of having courageous conversations—and talking about matters that really influence the effectiveness of the organization.

Underlying this intervention method is the clinical paradigm, the psychodynamic-systemic lens allowing us to explore people’s inner theater and motivations. This conceptual framework brings a deeper and more nuanced understanding of intra-personal, interpersonal, team, and organizational phenomena. Through it, we discover a world of fantasy, dreams, and daydreams, all representing forces that bear on our decisions, actions, and interactions.

Personal and organizational change starts with an honest look at what holds us back. To this end, multiparty feedback questionnaires can show the gap between self-perception and the perception of others. I am referring to feedback on a person’s individual leadership style, but also pertaining to team dynamics and organizational culture. If the process is done well, this feedback (preferably shared in a group setting) provides a more rounded portrait of the individual, the team, and the corporate culture. Such an assessment can have a deep emotional impact and produce paths for change.

From my own experiences with thousands of executives, short periods of “play”—experimentation with ideas and feelings—in a group setting can yield more insights than hours of presentations. Play unleashes the opportunity to start conversations that contribute to change. Taking the form of various “ice breakers” touching on deeply felt emotional issues, these “play sessions” create a transitional space where participants become willing to discuss the things that really matter.

Stories for real change

Narration is another gate to illuminative catharsis. Coaching is always a narrative process. Telling our personal stories to a group of people that listen in a respectful manner can be emotionally impactful. Talking about what bothers us provides an opportunity to re-experience and transform deeply troubling themes in our life. It can help us better understand why certain psychological issues keep holding us back and why we persist in dysfunctional behavioral patterns that hurt the organization.

Furthermore, while listening to other life stories, we may realize that we are not alone in our confusion. We may come to understand that others, too, struggle with similar problems. This offers many opportunities to discuss alternative ways of dealing with common situations. In addition, as participants give each other support, they become part of a true and supportive community.

To get the best out of people, organizations need to inscribe courageous explorations and conversations into their DNA. The intervention method that I described helps create a culture that reflects people’s realities, with a cascading effect from the top. Courageous conversations can be contagious in a good way, transferring between individuals, moving through teams, and finally, spreading throughout the whole organization. Eventually, as these courageous conversations become integrated into a coaching culture, the organization can bloom into a workplace that gives meaning and purpose, one that has the C4 in its DNA.

Discuss

About The Author

Manfred Kets de Vries’s picture

Manfred Kets de Vries

Manfred Kets de Vries is a clinical professor of leadership and organizational change; an author, co-author, and editor of 35 books; and a consultant and educator on organizational design/transformation and strategic human resource in more than 40 countries. A recipient of The Lifetime Achievement Award from The Leadership Legacy Project of the International Leadership Association, Kets de Vries is viewed as one of the world’s six founding professionals in the development of leadership as a field and discipline. Kets de Vries founded INSEAD’s Global Leadership Center, and is founder and program director of INSEAD’s Challenge of Leadership Program.