{domain:"www.qualitydigest.com",server:"169.47.211.87"} Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

What Went Wrong?

Recognizing strategic errors in the lean movement

Bob Emiliani
Wed, 02/24/2016 - 12:46
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

Nearly 30 years after the start of the lean movement, there is widespread agreement that things have not gone according to plan. Of course, there have been some notable successes (particularly from those who worked with Shingijutsu), yet they are far fewer in number than anyone expected, given the wide-ranging benefits of lean management to all stakeholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is not criticism resulting from hindsight—far from it. What happened could be seen and understood in real time or after short delays of one to three years. These are the miscalculations that I observed:

• The strength to which people are attracted to tools to improve their existing management practices, and conversely, the near-total lack of interest in a completely new system of management. Thus, lean tools that are peripheral to core industrial engineering methods used in kaizen became very popular. This includes 5S, visual controls, value stream maps, A3 reports, and gemba walks.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by cgneal on Wed, 02/24/2016 - 09:23

Respect for people / layoffs

Whenever I've mentioned lean principles to my 'blue collar' friends, there has been invariably a strongly negative reaction. Their experiences have led them to associate the discipline with job cuts. In Bob's goodie on respect for people, he makes reference to 'zero sum'. That's the problem, the stakeholders are often all fighting over their share of the pie when what they should be doing is working together to make a bigger pie!

  • Reply

Add new comment

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2025 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us