Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Akhilesh Gulati
To solve thorny problems, you can’t have either a purely internal or external view
Katie Rapp
The future of manufacturing is about making processes more efficient
Bryan Christiansen
And when to hire one
Tom Taormina
How to transition from a certified quality professional to an expert in business management systems
Chip Reavley
Well-designed solutions lower costs and increase revenue

More Features

Lean News
Quality doesn’t have to sacrifice efficiency
Weighing supply and customer satisfaction
Specifically designed for defense and aerospace CNC machining and manufacturing
From excess inventory and nonvalue work to $2 million in cost savings
Tactics aim to improve job quality and retain a high-performing workforce
Sept. 28–29, 2022, at the MassMutual Center in Springfield, MA
Enables system-level modeling with 2D and 3D visualization, reducing engineering effort, risk, and cost
It is a smart way to eliminate waste and maximize value
Simplified process focuses on the fundamentals every new ERP user needs

More News

Kevin Meyer


Take the Time to Get the Full Story

You might learn something unexpected, perhaps even about yourself

Published: Monday, December 9, 2019 - 13:03

Most of us have learned that being busy does not mean you’re being productive, and that multitasking leads to being less productive—although I still see that being harped on as a “skill” on resumes and profiles. Leading organizations manage by clearly defined objectives rather than arbitrary and often unrelated work hours, enabling flexible workplaces that create additional value for everyone.

With that said, we still like deadlines and other time constraints. Used properly, they enable progress and force decisions. Used improperly and arbitrarily, perhaps more common than not, they create chaos, stress, lower quality, and poor decision making. Where’s the balance? We often say that a sign of a good leader is knowing when there is sufficient information to make a decision—not too little and not waiting for too much. Under the stress inherent in most organizations, this often skews toward too little.

I’ve learned a few lessons over the years along these lines. In one situation we were trying to understand why there was a small but significant dip in quality on a machine that happened once and sometimes twice a day. We looked at data and tried to tie that back to machine parameters, with no success. We stood and observed the machine for two hours at a shot. Nothing. Then one day at the end of another observation session, we were discussing what to investigate next when it happened: an unplanned operator rotation. We had detailed standard work and highly trained operators, but this observation led us to find a small difference in crossover communication that was not captured on the standard work and had an unexpected impact on the product.

We had decided on two-hour observation sessions believing that was a limit of the ability of an observer, would align with break times, and we wanted results quickly. But it was not aligned with the process itself; therefore we were missing information.

An analogous situation happened to me a couple years ago. I had just read an article that mentioned a great way to show respect to homeless people is to simply take the time to talk with them. So on my next visit to a local market, instead of throwing down a buck in their bucket, I said hi.

Turns out the guy had a college degree and had owned a small one-person business in a nearby town, but lost it when he went bankrupt due to medical expenses. He has spent the last year trying to claw back, with his top priority keeping his cell phone so he could check email and make phone calls for potential interviews, which was difficult as he didn’t have a credit card or permanent address.

Taking the extra few minutes blew away the common misperceptions I had. Digging into it a bit more, I discovered this driver of homelessness is very common, and there are some organizations that now focus on providing that infrastructure, and some states have had remarkable success by simply providing housing.

One final example: My wife and I love to travel and have visited more than 65 countries. For the last several years we’ve avoided the typical tourist itineraries and tried to focus on the people side of those countries, but they have still been relatively brief visits—just a few days to maybe a week or at most two. We know we’ve been missing a lot.

Our goal for future trips, hopefully starting next year, is to have longer and more open-ended itineraries. We’d like to go back to our favorite places and stay a month, perhaps longer, living in an Airbnb or home exchange. Tops on the list are Buenos Aires, Hobart, maybe Ljubljana or Dubrovnik. We’d settle in, wander around, meet people, and dive deeper into the area. Along similar lines, we’d also like to take a month to drive across the back roads of Canada, from Halifax to Vancouver, with no itinerary. If we liked some place, we’d stay an extra couple days.

Sometimes it’s necessary to slow down and dig deeper to get the real story. You might learn something new and unexpected, perhaps even about yourself.

First published Nov. 6, 2019, on Kevin Meyer’s website.


About The Author

Kevin Meyer’s picture

Kevin Meyer

Kevin Meyer has more than 25 years of executive leadership experience, primarily in the medical device industry, and has been active in lean manufacturing for more than 20 years serving as director and manager in operations and advanced engineering, and as CEO of a medical device manufacturing company. He consults and speaks at lean events; operates the online knowledgebase, Lean CEO, and the lean training portal, Lean Presentations; and is a partner in GembaAcademy.com, which provides lean training to more than 5,000 companies. Meyer is co-author of Evolving Excellence–Thoughts on Lean Enterprise Leadership (iUniverse Inc., 2007) and writes weekly on a blog of the same name.