Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Scott Heide
Throwing every option into a master BOM, followed by turning elements on and off is not lean, efficient, or effective
Quality Digest
March 30, 2021, at 11 a.m. Pacific
Jim Benson
We could do with a few more conversations about respect
Adam Conner-Simons
Fabricaide, developed at MIT CSAIL, provides live design feedback to help users reduce leftover material
Jim Benson
Relationships are the transformation of understanding into appropriate action

More Features

Lean News
Carbon dioxide can make up a significant percentage of concrete mass
Freedom platform connects to any industrial asset to provide automated intelligence related to asset availability, utilization, and continuous improvement
Galileo’s Telescope describes how to measure success at the top of the organization, translate down to every level of supervision
Too often process enhancements occur in silos where there is little positive impact on the big picture
This book is a tool for improvement and benchmarking
Real-time data collection and custom solutions for any size shop, machine type, or brand
Collect measurements, visual defect information, simple Go/No-Go situations from any online device
What continual improvement, change, and innovation are, and how they apply to performance improvement
Incorporates additional functionality and continuing improvements to the product’s existing rich features

More News

Quality Transformation With David Schwinn


Quality Transformation

A journey toward truth

Published: Monday, September 26, 2016 - 15:17

We recently had dinner with a wonderful friend and colleague, Michelle Guenther. During our meal, Michelle mentioned a conversation at work when she responded to a question with, “What I believe to be true is....” She said she frequently prefaces her answers to questions with that phrase and that she got it from me.

I was pleasantly surprised. I, too, frequently use that phrase when confronted with significant or challenging questions. The preface may always be needed, but often I just forget to say it… or maybe I do know the truth, sometimes. For me these are difficult and important definitions. I like to think I’m on a journey toward the truth that I may not finish while I’m still alive.

A long and winding path

My journey started as a youngster. At that time, I believed the truth to be whatever Mom, Dad, my extended family, my teachers, and books said. During adolescence, I began to realize that some truths seemed to disagree with other truths. At the time many things seemed vexing; one was that if you needed to believe in Jesus to get to heaven, what happened to those who died in infancy, or never heard of Jesus, or chose another path to immortality? I was blessed to be fairly active in a church that included theological students who were very open to conversations about such things. When I asked them questions like who gets to heaven and why, they said those were questions that they, too, were struggling with. The truth began to get a little less definitive for me.

My engineering education gave me another perspective. At General Motors Institute, we were taught to solve problems using formulas and constants that were purported to be the truth. That seemed to work pretty well until, in our senior design course, we were told to provide a 200-percent/500-percent safety factor. We weren’t told exactly which percentage to apply or why. As Six Sigma practitioners, we all know that those safety factors were mostly caused by the existence of variation. Deming’s “Everything is one of a kind” seems to ring true, but seems to be ignored or unknown by many, if not most, people.

My graduate work added further considerations. The takeaway from my course in systems management has always been that everyone needs a rock… something that is absolutely true. My instructor told us that this is necessary to maintain our sanity as well as to make life easier, because we don’t have to question every piece of information we come across. That idea made sense to me. He said some people need many things to be true, including where you put your cereal box, because it makes life easier. Other people don’t need so many things to be true to maintain their sanity.

My work at Ford provided yet more insight. During my time at Ford’s world headquarters, my good friend and colleague, Ed Baker, would sometimes remind me that the “facts” I would state were “… based on the existing evidence…” It took me a few years before I more deeply appreciated that little reminder. During that time, Deming also taught us about variation and the need for operational definitions, another reminder that facts, or truths, are a little less clear than we sometimes assume.

The consulting phase of my vocational journey brought me still more perspectives on this idea of the truth. Peter Senge was a keynote speaker at a systems thinking conference I attended years ago. His presentation was titled “Crisis of Perception.” He, to my mind, effectively argued that we made it all up. We made up trees, buildings, weeds, flowers… everything, because we categorized things and named them. One simple example of this phenomenon is that what some people call weeds other people call flowers. Among other things, he convinced me that we made up God. That struck a nerve because my “rock” that I discussed earlier was “God is love.” If that was all I had for a rock and I made it up, how was I to stay sane? This so shook me up that I approached Senge immediately after his presentation and shared my personal dilemma. He said that it was OK to believe whatever we thought to be true so long as it worked for us in a complex and thoughtful world. That saved my sanity, but reminded me to be more responsible when considering what I stated and believed to be true.

Another teacher, colleague, and wonderful friend, Jamshid Gharajedaghi, gave me more insight into this idea of truth. Gharajedaghi said to begin to understand any system you must look at it from as many different perspectives as possible. Jamshid went on to say that objectivity is simply subjectivity that is generally agreed on by many people. Remember the parable of the blind men and an elephant? Another way to think about it is what we learned from Gerry Nadler, another great systems thinker. Nadler shared with us the phrase: “The map is never the territory,” coined by Alfred Korzybski.

Going back to my one of my early questions about truth and spirituality, Buddha provides one more insight: “Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.”

Finally, Noriaki Kano tells us, as practitioners of continual improvement, to ask a series of questions given five different situations. One of those five situations is that we are given a fact (a truth). If we are given a fact, we should ask the person providing the fact:
• How do you know?
• Where’s the data?
• How did you get it?

That’s probably good information to provide without request when we state “the truth.”

Kathy Dannemiller, a well-known organizational development consultant, used to say that everyone’s truth is their truth. I think she was correct, but I also think we need to be thoughtful regarding anything we label as the truth. That’s what I believe to be true.

As always, I treasure and look forward to receiving your comments and questions.


About The Author

Quality Transformation With David Schwinn’s picture

Quality Transformation With David Schwinn

David Schwinn, an associate of PQ Systems, is a full-time professor of management at Lansing Community College and a part-time consultant in the college’s Small Business and Technology Development Center. He is also a consultant in systems and organizational development with InGenius and INTERACT Associates.

Schwinn worked at Ford’s corporate quality office and worked with W. Edwards Deming beginning in the early 1980s until Deming’s death.  Schwinn is a professional engineer with an MBA from Wright State University. You can reach him at support@pqsystems.com.  




There are four kinds of knowledge:   The things that you know that you know   The things that you don't know that you know   The things that you know that you don't know   The things that you don't know that you don't know

Problems arise when the last becomes confused with the first