Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Bruce Hamilton
Will lean thinking inform the designers of AI?
Gene Kaschak
Lean supply is not just about the size of inventory
OpusWorks
Eight unique best-practice sessions featuring 11 process improvement and thought leaders
Harish Jose
Learning how to better ask “Why?”

More Features

Lean News
From excess inventory and nonvalue work to $2 million in cost savings
Tactics aim to improve job quality and retain a high-performing workforce
Sept. 28–29, 2022, at the MassMutual Center in Springfield, MA
Enables system-level modeling with 2D and 3D visualization, reducing engineering effort, risk, and cost
It is a smart way to eliminate waste and maximize value
Simplified process focuses on the fundamentals every new ERP user needs
DigiLEAN software helps companies digitize their lean journey
Partnership embeds quality assurance at every stage of the product life cycle, enables agile product introduction
First trial module of learning tool focuses on ISO 9001 and is available now

More News

Gwendolyn Galsworth

Lean

The Invisible Enemy

Ruler of the nonvisual workplace

Published: Thursday, May 18, 2017 - 12:01

There is an enemy in your company, and it’s invisible. You can’t see it because it literally is not there. Yet its impact is massive on every level of the enterprise, from boardroom to marketing to operations to the field staff. And the only way we have even the smallest chance of destroying it is by focusing on what it causes... its footprint.

Can you name it?

Yes, the enemy is information deficits: information that is either incomplete, imprecise, misleading, late/too late, wrong, or simply not there. This missing information is always vital to the task at hand, but its main attribute is its unavailability, whether by neglect or by oversight. Another way to say this is “missing answers.”

Missing answers are rampant in the workplace, whether factory, hospital, office, or government agency. Here I am not referring to information that we as customers might request from, for example, a government agency—the DMV, IRS, or Social Security; that is a different order of answer. The missing answers under discussion are the ones we need to do our own work.

But because they are missing, we cannot see them. We can only see their impact on us, their footprint. That footprint’s name is “motion.” Yes, motion is one of the seven deadly wastes, defined as “moving without working.” When Taiichi Ohno, co-architect with Shigeo Shingo of the Toyota Production System, named motion as a waste back during the 1960s, he was referring to the fact that a machine operator was given nothing to do while the machine cycled. He decided to change that.

When I was writing my first visual workplace book, Visual Systems (AMACOM 1997), I wanted to find a measurement device or yardstick by which people could assess the need for workplace visuality. Motion/moving without working fit the bill perfectly because that was exactly what happened when needed information was missing at work: People were busy but not working. The types or forms may sound familiar, even commonplace, but they are no less lethal: searching, looking for, wondering, wandering, guessing, counting (already a type of motion), counting again (double motion). The list goes on and always includes our gang of four—asking questions, answering questions, interrupting to ask/being interrupted to answer... and the great catchall: waiting, waiting for answers that may come but only probably.

Information deficits don’t just cause motion; they make it contagious. I am missing some information, so I interrupt you to see if you can supply it. You, ever polite and helpful, apologize because you do not know, and go the extra step to interrupt your co-worker to ask her. She doesn’t know but volunteers to make a phone call to check with a friend in another department. And the beat goes on. The disease spreads. The interruptions continue. Untracked and unnoticed, the cost caused by the invisible enemy swells. Missing answers rule the nonvisual workplace.

Did you know: It takes us 8 to 10 minutes to recover from an interruption, any interruption, no matter how long or how short? To recover doesn’t mean to merely get back to the task at hand, but instead to get back to the level of focused attention you had before the interruption. Some of us get interrupted continuously, so often that we are convinced answering questions is our job whether we like it or not. In some companies we are called supervisors.

But think. What would happen if the answers to the questions you are constantly asked resided instead in the work environment as visual devices? What would change for you if missing answers, the invisible enemy, were removed from your work day by implementing visual workplace principles and practices? What would change in you?

These are important questions. How will you answer them?

First published on the Visual Thinking website.

Discuss

About The Author

Gwendolyn Galsworth’s picture

Gwendolyn Galsworth

Gwendolyn Galsworth, Ph.D., has been implementing visuality for more than 30 years. She’s focused on codifying the visual workplace concepts, principles, and technologies into a single, coherent sustainable framework of knowledge. Galsworth founded Visual Thinking Inc. in 1991, and in 2005 she launched The Visual-Lean Institute where in-house trainers and external consultants are trained and certified in the Institute’s nine core visual workplace methods. Two of the seven books Galsworth has written received the Shingo Research and Professional Publication Award.