Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Kelsey Rzepecki
5S is one of the easiest ways to build a foundation for operational success
Bruce Hamilton
Bears’ learned behavior, called enrichment, is much like human behavior during coaching kata
Kevin Meyer
How an Austrian psychotherapist sheds light on budgeting
Nicole Radziwill
Quality architecture means examining the performance of the system as a whole
Eric Stoop
Five steps to create momentum and lasting value

More Features

Lean News
The FDA wants medical device manufactures to succeed, new technologies in supply chain managment
Marking floors is an easy and efficient way to direct behavior, promote safety, and reinforce workplace standards
SQCpack and GAGEpack offer a comprehensive approach to improving product quality and consistency
Management's role in improving work climate and culture
Customized visual dashboards by Visual Workplace help measure performance
Helps manufacturers by focusing on problems and problem resolution in real time
Ask questions, exchange ideas and best practices, share product tips, discuss challenges in quality improvement initiatives

More News

Paul Foster

Lean

Five Root Cause Analysis Tools for More Effective Problem-Solving

Achieving sustainable continuous improvement

Published: Monday, November 19, 2018 - 12:03

Next to defining a problem accurately, root cause analysis is one of the most important elements of problem-solving in quality management. That’s because if you’re not aiming at the right target, you’ll never be able to eliminate the real problem that’s hurting quality.

So which type of root cause analysis tool is the best one to use? Manufacturers have a range of methods at their fingertips, each of which is appropriate for different situations. Below we discuss five common root cause analysis tools, including:
• Pareto chart
• The 5 Whys
• Fishbone diagram
• Scatter diagram
• Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)

1. Pareto chart

A Pareto chart is a histogram or bar chart combined with a line graph that groups the frequency or cost of different problems to show their relative significance. The bars show frequency in descending order, while the line shows cumulative percentage or total as you move from left to right.


Figure 1: Pareto chart

The Pareto chart example above is a report from layered process audit software that groups together the top seven categories of failed audit questions for a given facility. Layered process audits (LPAs) allow you to check high-risk processes daily to verify conformance to standards. LPAs identify process variations that cause defects, and Pareto charts are a powerful reporting tool for analyzing LPA findings.

Pareto charts are one of the seven basic tools of quality described by quality pioneer Joseph Juran. They are based on Pareto’s law, also called the 80/20 rule, which says that 20 percent of inputs drive 80 percent of results.

2. Five Whys

The 5 Whys is a method that uses a series of questions to drill down into successive layers of a problem. The basic idea is that each time you ask why, the answer becomes the basis of the next why. It’s a simple tool useful for problems where you don’t need advanced statistics; you don’t necessarily want to use it for complex problems.

One application of this technique is to more deeply analyze the results of a Pareto analysis. Here’s an example of how to use the 5 Whys:

Problem: Final assembly time exceeds target
• Why is downtime in final assembly higher than our goal? According to the Pareto chart, the biggest factor is operators needing to constantly adjust Machine A
• Why do operators need to constantly adjust Machine A? Because it keeps having alignment problems
• Why does Machine A keep having alignment problems? Because the seals are worn
• Why are Machine A’s seals worn? Because they aren’t being replaced as part of our preventive maintenance program
• Why aren’t they being replaced as part of our preventive maintenance program? Because seal replacement wasn’t captured in the needs assessment

Of course, it may take asking why more than five times to solve the problem—the point is to peel away surface-level issues to get to the root cause.

3. Fishbone diagram

A fishbone diagram sorts possible causes into various categories that branch off from the original problem. Also called a cause-and-effect or Ishakawa diagram, a fishbone diagram may have multiple sub-causes branching off of each identified category.


Figure 2: Fishbone diagram. Download free fishbone diagram template

4. Scatter plot diagram

A scatter plot or scatter diagram uses pairs of data points to help uncover relationships between variables. A scatter plot is a quantitative method for determining whether two variables are correlated, such as testing potential causes identified in your fishbone diagram.

Making a scatter diagram is as simple as plotting your independent variable (or suspected cause) on the x-axis, and your dependent variable (the effect) on the y-axis. If the pattern shows a clear line or curve, you know the variables are correlated, and you can proceed to regression or correlation analysis.


Figure 3: Scatter plot diagram

5. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a method used during product or process design to explore potential defects or failures. An FMEA chart outlines:
• Potential failures, consequences, and causes
• Current controls to prevent each type of failure
• Severity (S), occurrence (O) and detection (D) ratings that allow you to calculate a risk priority number (RPN) for determining further action

When applied to process analysis, this method is called process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA). Many manufacturers use PFMEA findings to inform questions for process audits, using this problem-solving tool to reduce risk at the source.


Figure 4: FMEA chart. Download free PFMEA template

No matter which tool you use, root cause analysis is just the beginning of the problem-solving process. Once you know the cause, the next step is implementing a solution and conducting regular checks to ensure you’re holding the gain and achieving sustainable continuous improvement.

Discuss

About The Author

Paul Foster’s picture

Paul Foster

Paul Foster is Product Manager at Ease, where he designs products and provides customer onboarding and support. A veteran of the Air Force, he served on the data integrity team and supported technical inspections on B52 bombers and F16 fighter jets. Paul holds a B.A. in Physics from Cal Poly - San Luis Obispo and an MBA from Oklahoma State University. Foster has a passion for coding and builds Android apps in his spare time.