Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Jon Terry
Six lessons learned from high-performing lean teams
Nicola Olivetti
Digital visual management puts visual tools into the hands of team members across multiple sites
Jesse Allred
Preventive, not reactive
Kevin Price
Turning to smart technologies to keep mission-critical equipment running—no matter what
Bill Laverty
Quality and technology work together to maintain supply chain efficiency

More Features

Lean News
April 25, 2019 workshop focused on hoshin kanri and critical leadership skills related to strategy deployment and A3 thinking
Makes it faster and easier to find and return tools to their proper places
Adapt lean in a way that makes sense for your service organization
Remanufacturing is a way to transform a disposal burden into a business opportunity
Version 3.1 increases flexibility and ease of use with expanded data formatting features
Results for a three-day, waste-free conference were 2,061 pounds of waste diverted from the landfill
The FDA wants medical device manufactures to succeed, new technologies in supply chain managment
Marking floors is an easy and efficient way to direct behavior, promote safety, and reinforce workplace standards
SQCpack and GAGEpack offer a comprehensive approach to improving product quality and consistency

More News

Greg Cresswell

Lean

Which Is the Most Important Step in PDCA?

A water-cooler debate

Published: Monday, April 17, 2017 - 12:01

Occasionally, my colleagues and I will take a step back from the day-to-day and have a more philosophical discussion about the field of ergonomics. Recently, the question was raised, “In the plan-do-check-act continuous improvement cycle, which step is the most important?” This sparked some interesting debate. Here are the arguments we came up with for each step:

Plan. This is the foundation for the entire process. If you don’t have a strategic plan with goals and steps in place, how will you know what you’re working toward? This step ensures that everyone involved is aligned, knows their responsibilities, and is headed in the right direction at the start. This is probably the most commonly skipped step and, unfortunately, if it is ignored, your process may fail.

Do. This is the part of the process in which things get done, and it’s certainly the most visible step. One of the hurdles organizations often face is getting started. This is especially true in larger, very bureaucratic organizations. The argument for “do” being the most important step is that if it is skipped, nothing happens, and there is no process to begin with.

Check. Checking confirms that you’re on target to do what you said you would do. Regular check-ins confirm that everyone is in sync and progressing toward the end goal. When things aren’t on track, it’s a good time to readjust resources and timelines as needed. Without this step, there is no way to know if you’re on track. The process can still function, but at the end of the year, you may find that you haven’t achieved your goal, and omitting the check step may be the reason.

Act. During this part of the process, you reflect on what went well and what could have gone better. It triggers the continuous improvement. This step is critical for standardizing the parts of the process that are working, and tweaking the parts of the process that need more attention. If this isn’t done, you’re not running a “process,” just a “program”—something with a start and, likely soon, a finish.

In the end, all of the steps are important, but some people may gravitate to one step more than another because it aligns better with their strengths and interests.

For more information about the PDCA continuous improvement process, check out Humantech’s position statement, “Managing Ergonomics as a Continuous Improvement Process.”

Discuss

About The Author

Greg Cresswell’s picture

Greg Cresswell

Gregory Cresswell, Managing Consultant and Ergonomics Engineer for Humantech, leads large-scale ergonomics project deployments and helps organizations build internal expertise by delivering training sessions to engineering and safety personnel. Greg works closely with companies to understand their needs and develop a process that will allow them to integrate human factors into production operations.

Comments

Great question

I often ask this question when interviewing job candidates.  As you've noted, it gives great insight to the person's perspectives and interests.