Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Lean Features
Bruce Hamilton
Will lean thinking inform the designers of AI?
Gene Kaschak
Lean supply is not just about the size of inventory
Eight unique best-practice sessions featuring 11 process improvement and thought leaders
Harish Jose
Learning how to better ask “Why?”

More Features

Lean News
From excess inventory and nonvalue work to $2 million in cost savings
Tactics aim to improve job quality and retain a high-performing workforce
Sept. 28–29, 2022, at the MassMutual Center in Springfield, MA
Enables system-level modeling with 2D and 3D visualization, reducing engineering effort, risk, and cost
It is a smart way to eliminate waste and maximize value
Simplified process focuses on the fundamentals every new ERP user needs
DigiLEAN software helps companies digitize their lean journey
Partnership embeds quality assurance at every stage of the product life cycle, enables agile product introduction
First trial module of learning tool focuses on ISO 9001 and is available now

More News

Jesse Lyn Stoner


Criticism, Boundaries, and Useful Feedback

Timing is important

Published: Thursday, October 20, 2016 - 16:25

Larry was clearly angry. Carl had used his tools (again) without asking, and even worse, hadn’t returned them (again). Larry told me he had given Carl some “tough feedback.”

He told Carl that he was self-centered and insensitive, and in the future he needed to ask for permission before borrowing anything. He was surprised and indignant that Carl got angry with him.

Photo credit: Bigstock/Digitalista

Larry didn’t understand that telling Carl off is not “giving feedback.” It’s simply criticism. Setting boundaries around what Carl can borrow is a reasonable thing to do, but that’s not “feedback” either.

Feedback is providing information about your reaction to a product or to a person’s actions, to be used as a basis for improvement. Criticizing and setting boundaries are solely for Larry’s benefit, not Carl’s. Larry might have felt better by blowing off steam, but in the end, it didn’t lead to a satisfying conversation or resolution to the problem.

If Larry had really given feedback, it’s more likely he would have been heard and have gotten a thoughtful response.

Feedback is meant to benefit the receiver

The purpose of feedback is to provide information that can be used for improvement.

When someone is unaware of the effect they are having on others, feedback gives them an opportunity to self-correct so their behavior matches their intentions. It helps them be more effective in achieving what they desire.

Feedback to companies helps them improve their products and services and retain customers. Complaining to a customer service rep who is not empowered to do anything is a waste of your time and energy because your information doesn’t get heard within the system and therefore cannot be used for improvement. You might blow off steam at the rep, but that is solely for your own benefit.

Tips for giving useful feedback

1. Be descriptive, not evaluative. Judgmental words, like “selfish” and “insensitive make people defensive, and it’s difficult for them to hear what you are saying. When you simply describe what happened, without evaluating, it creates space for them to come to their own conclusions. Even when someone does something well, it’s much more helpful to be descriptive about what they did than to say they were “good,” “great,” or “terrific.” Tell them what they did that was terrific so they know what to repeat.
2. Be specific. Telling someone they are “dominating” is not as useful as saying, “You ignored my comments and interrupted me several times. I was frustrated because I felt like I either needed to confront you or be silent, and I didn’t want to do either.” The word “dominating” can be confusing because it means different things to people. A clear, specific description of what occurred provides a basis for an open discussion.
3. Describe your own reactions. Don’t speak for others. You might share what you have heard or observed from others if you are willing to name the individuals. But it’s a slippery slope when you speak for others. Be careful about attributing to a group of people because you might be wrong. What you know for sure are your own reactions, and you are most effective when you focus on that.
4. Consider the needs of the receiver. Is this something that will benefit them? Feedback can be destructive when it serves only your own needs. If you’re only giving feedback to make yourself feel better, think twice about it.
5. Direct feedback toward behavior. the receiver can do something about. It’s not helpful to give feedback on a shortcoming they have no control over.
6. Useful feedback is solicited, not imposed. At the very least, ask if they are open to getting some feedback before you begin.
7. Timing is important. Generally, feedback is most useful at the earliest opportunity after something occurs, depending on the person’s readiness to hear it, support available from others, etc.
8. Find out if your communication was clear. Feedback is not always heard the way it was intended. One way to find out is to ask them to rephrase what they heard from you.
9. No expectations. Even when you follow all these guidelines, your feedback still might not be what the receiver wants or needs at the moment. There should be no expectation the other person will change. Your feedback is simply a gift. It’s up to them to determine whether or how they use it.


About The Author

Jesse Lyn Stoner’s picture

Jesse Lyn Stoner

Jesse Lyn Stoner, founder of consultancy Seapoint Center, has worked with hundreds of leaders using collaborative processes to engage the entire workforce in creating their desired future. Stoner has authored several books including Full Steam Ahead! Unleash the Power of Vision (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2nd rev. ed. 2011), co-authored with Ken Blanchard. Stoner is recognized by the American Management Association as one of the Top Leaders to Watch in 2015 and by INC Magazine as one of the Top 100 Leadership Experts. Stoner has advanced degrees in psychology and family system, and a doctorate in organizational development.