Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Innovating Service With Chip Bell
...let’s not be seduced into thinking comfort is ‘all about effort’
Taran March @ Quality Digest
From digital submissions to integrated document control, the agency moves into the lean arena
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
By scaring off small medical-device companies, Canada could limit number of important and innovative products
Ryan E. Day
Finch Therapeutics forges a QMS for a life-saving treatment not yet approved by the FDA
Mike Richman
FARO’s new 8-Axis Quantum ScanArm changes the game for manufacturing

More Features

Innovation News
Standards like ISO 10303 and ISO 14306 help to keep planes high in the sky
‘Materials science has never produced anything like this.’
Goal is to improve productivity, reduce unplanned downtime, and accelerate visual learning
‘There is nothing worse than creating a solution and then looking for a problem to solve with it.’
Real value unlocked by new designs, and by speed and flexibility of operations
The FDA wants medical device manufactures to succeed, new technologies in supply chain managment
Other exhibits will feature machine tools to demonstrate tool setting, probing, machine monitoring, and robotic gauging
The custom-built, 727 cu in. Hemi engine will be raffled to support Victory Junction children’s camp

More News

Intel

Innovation

Making Factories Better Places for Humans to Work

‘There is nothing worse than creating a solution and then looking for a problem to solve with it.’

Published: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 - 11:00

(Intel: Santa Clara, CA) -- Irene Petrick is the director of industrial innovation in the Industrial Solutions Division of Intel, and a member of Intel’s Internet of Things Group. Faith McCreary is a principal engineer, experience architect, researcher, and member of Intel’s Internet of Things Group. Petrick and McCreary came to Intel after careers in consulting, research, and academia. After they interviewed employees—from CEOs to factory workers—at 133 manufacturers, they co-authored a research paper on Industry 4.0. One key finding: 59 percent of people in manufacturing want “intelligent” solutions to take on work described as manual or labor-intensive.

How they would describe their work to a 10-year-old: “We imagine the factory of the future that is smart enough to take care of itself most of the time,” McCreary says.

A factory that knows: “In an auto manufacturing plant, machines will ‘know’ when they need maintenance; they will collaborate with each other,” says Petrick, offering an example of an intelligent solution. “Mobile robots will move materials rather than conveyor belts, and much of this manual labor will happen without people.”

Machines doing what they do best: “In the factory of the future, people will do what people do best, and machines will do what machines do best,” McCreary says. “Machines do the repetitive tasks and even learn to anticipate how to do those tasks better. The factory of the future will be constantly learning how to improve its operations.”

Less perspiration, more inspiration: Today, many factory environments require hard physical labor. In the future, maybe not so much. “Instead of the back-breaking work of the assembly line, people in the future will spend their time troubleshooting and improving overall operations,” says Petrick, thinking again of that hypothetical auto plant. “Their work will be more creative and strategic, and their work will not be rooted to the factory floor.”

Less repetition, fewer hazards: “A lot of what goes on in a factory today is hard on people, either because of the repetitive nature of the work or the potential hazards,” McCreary says. “Done right, technology has the potential to help eliminate the negatives of factory work and make it more uniquely human.”

Technology’s effect on the worker: Petrick explains that we often don’t give enough thought to the effects of technology on people—or the reverse. “There is nothing worse than creating a solution and then looking for a problem to solve with it,” says Petrick.

In their factory interviews, Petrick and McCreary found an undercurrent of distrust or even fear of “letting go of human control in manufacturing processes.” Many of the people they talked with—especially on the factory floor—said they worried about being left behind as manufacturing becomes “smarter” and less reliant on human sweat or outmoded skills.

“Getting people and technologies to work together means that we need to understand them both better,” McCreary says.

Listening to factory workers: Petrick says there’s a wrong way and a right way to make factories smarter. “Most technology is introduced in the factory in a very top-down fashion,” says Petrick. “If we can change that, and actually start leveraging the knowledge and passion of the people in the factory in the process, imagine what we could do? Our research shows that a majority of people in the factory world—from people on the factory floor to execs in the C-suite—agree there are opportunities for change. The right approach is to tap into this consensus and use it to speed the adoption of the future smart factory.”

Discuss

About The Author

Intel’s picture

Intel

Intel invents at the boundaries of technology to make amazing experiences possible for business and society. The company believes technology must constantly evolve to make more things possible and all things easier, smarter, and more connected than ever before.